Gartner has released their 2013 Wired and Wireless LAN Infrastructure Magic Quadrant. For the 2nd time in a row, Cisco is recognized as a leader in this highly anticipated publication.
Here is the 2013 Gartner Magic Quadrant for the Wired and Wireless LAN Access Infrastructure (Authors: Tim Zimmerman and Mark Fabbi; Published 3rd September 2013).
There are two primary criteria for the Gartner MQ — (a) the Completeness of Vision (b) Ability to Execute.
From a vision perspective, Cisco unveiled its vision of Unified Access – One Policy, One Management, One Network — more than a year back (last June, to be precise). This vision was the first step in helping our customers drive business innovations and achieving IT simplicity while addressing the rapid growth of BYOD and Mobility in their organizations.
We were also ahead of the times by having a vision for the network to be a strategic asset (and not a cost center) for our customers. And the way to make this happen was to leverage the network intelligence to drive new customer experiences and revenue opportunities. That’s where our vision of Connected Mobile Experiences (CMX) came about. The idea behind CMX was to enable organizations to improve customer loyalty and increase revenue by delivering context-aware mobile information that matches their customers’ real-time needs and preferences. A retail store, for example, can use the CMX solution to enhance mobile shopping experience, increase loyalty app usage, create targeted personalized marketing and context-rich notifications, and use on-premise visibility to understand and adapt to customer behavior. Its no surprise that the majority of our customers have jointly embraced this Cisco vision and a lot of our competitors are now trying to follow suit.
But the proof is in the pudding.. Read the full blog to find out how Cisco has executed on this vision.
And ruckus… no include?
…or Aerohive…or any of a number of others…
Gartner, in their infinite lack of wisdom, combined the wired and wireless networking space into a single magic quadrant. Now, in order to be considered, a vendor must have products in both spaces (wired & wireless). Kinda makes an “apples to apples” comparison difficult, don’t you think?
ok…so Aerohive is in there…bad example – but you get my meaning…
Comments are closed.