<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>High Tech Policy</title>
    <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov</link>
     <description>Thoughts and Opinions on Government Affairs</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>marybrow@cisco.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-02-05T22:26:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Smart Grid &amp;amp; Spectrum &#8211; Setting the Record Straight</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/smart_grid_spectrum_setting_the_record_straight/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/smart_grid_spectrum_setting_the_record_straight/</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the key policy debates now ongoing in Washington DC is whether to set aside spectrum for use in the smart grid &ndash; spectrum that the utilities could themselves use for their own deployments.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In a recent filing at the FCC, Cisco provided its thoughts on how the FCC might evaluate policies to promote and accelerate the use of smart grid technologies across the country.&nbsp; As it turns out,&nbsp; a portion of our filing was misrepresented in a blog and elsewhere on the internet, stating that we do not support additional spectrum allocations for utilities. In fact, we believe this is a critical issue at the FCC that goes beyond the boundaries of technology and should be evaluated based on business models and the need to accelerate smart grid deployments.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-02-05T22:26:22+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Sovereignty and National Security</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/sovereignty_and_national_security/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/sovereignty_and_national_security/</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';">Sovereignty and national security have always been key concerns for national governments. The need for self reliance and the avoidance of reliance on external parties&nbsp;are natural instincts for countries. In the early days, many developing economies adopted a policy of import substitution to avoid a dependence on foreign goods by creating domestic companies that can meet internal demands. Such initiatives also created jobs within the country to keep unemployment low. While these concerns and fears are legitimate and genuine, in today&rsquo;s global economy, it does not make sense for every country to produce everything it needs, nor to have domestic companies run every industry.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';">For example, while steel is important for nation building, steel production is not something that very country can do or need to do.&nbsp;Instead, they buy what they need from whomever offers them the best value for money. Air travel is essential to international commerce, but not every country can produce their own aircrafts. Today&rsquo;s main producers are Boeing and Airbus, and most airlines buy aircrafts from them. Extensive reliance on purchasing aircrafts from Boeing and Airbus has not limited the competitiveness and distinctive service level offered by globally successful airlines such as Singapore Airlines and Cathay Pacific. In the same breath, although many countries started with national carriers, not many have survived today, e.g. Swissair collapsed and the successor national airline Swiss was bought over by the German Lufthansa. Domestic production&nbsp;does not appear to be&nbsp;not a criteria for success.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: black; font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif';">What about the ICT sector?</span></p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-11-23T01:06:23+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>CITEL Seminar on Spectrum Requirements for Broadband Deployment</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/citel_seminar_on_spectrum_requirements_for_broadband_deployment/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/citel_seminar_on_spectrum_requirements_for_broadband_deployment/</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>I had an opportunity to participate this week at CITEL&rsquo;s seminar on Spectrum Requirements for Broadband Deployment. I titled my presentation &ldquo;<em>Spectrum Requirements for the Information Economy</em>,&rdquo; which I believe, this is what it is at stake.</p>
<p>There was overwhelming consensus in that one of the best policy determinations Governments could do to foster the development of wireless mobile broadband networks is putting spectrum to work.</p>
<p>The presentation is available in the following url: <a title="http://www.oas.org/en/media_center/videos.asp?sCodigo=09-0287&amp;videotype=&amp;sCollectionDetVideo=7" href="http://www.oas.org/en/media_center/videos.asp?sCodigo=09-0287&amp;videotype=&amp;sCollectionDetVideo=7">http://www.oas.org/en/media_center/videos.asp?sCodigo=09-0287&amp;videotype=&amp;sCollectionDetVideo=7</a></p>
<p>or click on READ MORE to view the video.</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-11-15T14:51:41+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Lisbon &#8220;Yes&#8221; could help Ireland&#8217;s &#8220;Smart Economy&#8221;</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/lisbon_yes_could_help_irelands_smart_economy/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/lisbon_yes_could_help_irelands_smart_economy/</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lisbon &ldquo;Yes&rdquo; could help Ireland&rsquo;s &ldquo;Smart  Economy&rdquo;:</strong> <em>October 3, 2009: Mike  Conroy, </em><em>General Manager, Cisco Galway Development Centre;&nbsp; Kim Majerus, Managing Director, Cisco Ireland and Monique Meche, Director,&nbsp; Government Affairs, Ireland</em></p>
<p>This afternoon,&nbsp; it became clear that Irish voters have accepted the Lisbon Treaty&nbsp;by a decisive majority and are satisfied that by retaining their EU Commissioner and local control over matters such as taxation,&nbsp; Ireland is ready to continue as a  strong participant in the European Union.</p>
<p>This is great news for&nbsp;the  citizens of Ireland and for companies like Cisco. &nbsp;Ireland has played an important part in the development of some of  our most innovative technologies. The future of&nbsp;Cisco&#8217;s unified communication portfolio is being  researched and developed in Galway.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Technology will&nbsp;play a central role in Ireland&rsquo;s stated  ambition to become a &ldquo;Smart Economy&rdquo;.&nbsp;&nbsp; Being a strong and participative member&nbsp;at  the heart of&nbsp;the European Union, combined with an open business  environment for global technology companies, will undoubtedly help  Ireland realise this ambition.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ireland has always prided itself on being a  gateway to Europe for many global technology  companies, including Cisco. Today&rsquo;s result will ensure that important role  continues for decades to come.</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-10-03T12:57:53+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Cisco Ireland says YES to Lisbon and YES to Europe</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/cisco_ireland_says_yes_to_lisbon_and_yes_to_europe/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/cisco_ireland_says_yes_to_lisbon_and_yes_to_europe/</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>29 September 2009, Dublin,&nbsp; Ireland: Mike Conroy, </em><em>General  Manager</em><em>, Cisco Development Centre; Kim Majerus, Managing  Director, Cisco Ireland and Monique Meche, Director, Government Affairs,&nbsp; Ireland</em></strong></p>
<p><img style="float: left;" title="EU Flag" src="http://www.meteo.lv/upload_pic/Informativi%20materiali/EU-flag-small1.jpg" alt="EU Flag" width="100" height="67" /></p>
<p>This&nbsp;Friday, Irish voters  will vote in a referendum to approve or reject the EU Lisbon treaty which would  create a permanent EU presidency, more unified EU-wide laws and&nbsp;improve the overall efficiency of&nbsp;the&nbsp;EU&#8217;s  operations. Ireland must approve the Treaty in order for it to take effect  across the 27-EU member bloc. Irish voters rejected the Treaty in a referendum  last year&nbsp;after&nbsp;widespread debate and some&nbsp;confusion. After rejection, Ireland  received important concessions from Brussels, including the right to retain an  Irish EU Commissioner.</p>
<p>Cisco employs approximately 200 people in Ireland across its Dublin and Galway R&amp;D Centre locations&#8230;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-09-29T17:15:30+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>&#8220;Unemployable, f***ing headbangers&#8221;</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/unemployable_fing_headbangers/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/unemployable_fing_headbangers/</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>The colourful Michael O&rsquo;Leary, CEO of Ryanair, Ireland and Europe&rsquo;s largest low-cost air carrier, has a certain <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyvVTRHYmZg">way with words</a> which must be a dream for journalists looking for a soundbite on the Irish vote on the Lisbon Treaty.&nbsp; O&rsquo;Leary cut out the niceties in using the title quote of this blog to describe the &lsquo;No&rsquo; supporters.&nbsp; Often portrayed as dull and too complex to understand, the Lisbon Treaty has nonetheless created plenty of fireworks between the opposing sides &ndash; with each accusing the other of misinformation and <a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/blogs/lisbonwatch/2009/09/23/coir-blimey/">dirty tricks</a>.</p>
<p>The Irish referendum this week is seen as the key hurdle to adopting Lisbon, which will reform the current institutional set-up of the EU.&nbsp; With the likes of Ryanair, Intel and Microsoft lining up behind the &lsquo;Yes&rsquo; campaign, the question I&rsquo;m interested in is why so many in business, and the high tech sector in particular, are supporting the Treaty?</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-09-29T08:44:15+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Smart Grids: Dept of Energy Report &amp;amp; Cisco Thoughts, Part 2</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/smart_grids_dept_of_energy_report_cisco_thoughts_part_2/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/smart_grids_dept_of_energy_report_cisco_thoughts_part_2/</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>The Dept of Energy last month (July 2009) released its <a href="http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/SGSRMain_090707_lowres.pdf" title="Smart Grid System Report">Smart Grid System Report</a>.&nbsp; In my <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/smart_grids_dept_of_energy_report_cisco_thoughts_part_1/#more" title="first posting ">first posting </a>on this report, I noted which areas were rated as Moderate in penetration or forecasted market trending.&nbsp; Of note were the key areas of Pricing and Regulatory Process, and why both were only marked as Moderate for future trending, given their core role in paying for utilities&#8217; massive investments in SmartGrid through more modern billing models and tariff policies.&nbsp; </p>

<p>In Part 2 of this blog series, I&#8217;ll focus on a couple of the more IT-related areas of the 20 Smart Grid components noted in this report.&nbsp; (Caveat: I am from Cisco, and our role in <a href="http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/energy/smart_grid_solutions.html" title="Smart Grids ">Smart Grids </a> is to leverage our experience in IT and communications to better enable both <a href="http://www.cisco.com/web/about/citizenship/environment/docs/sGrid_wp_c11-532328.pdf" title="utilities  ">utilities  </a>and energy customers by bringing end-to-end communications + security to Smart Grids)</p>

]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-08-07T16:29:20+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Power of Connectivity</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/the_power_of_connectivity/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/the_power_of_connectivity/</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>Recently I had the remarkable opportunity to meet <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakaya_Kikwete" title="President Kikwete">President Kikwete</a> of Tanzania and hear his vision for the future of his country.&nbsp; I was struck by how passionate he was about technology being the key for his developing country to leap-frog into the 21st century.&nbsp; He spoke with excitement of the promise that the subsea fibre-optic cable <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEACOM_(cable_system)" title="SEACOM">SEACOM</a> (now live!) will bring by connecting the people of Tanzania to the rest of the world; and how broadband will help his country overcome an acute shortage of teachers and doctors.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s pretty amazing when you think about how far we&#8217;ve come in a mere 150 years.&nbsp; </p>

<p>During the industrial revolution, railroads and steam engines connected farmers and merchants with distant markets. Today, connecting the world involves broadband instead of boats, cable instead of coal, and spectrum instead of steam.<br />
jyrkaxue4b<br />
President Kikwete clearly understands the transformational power of connectivity.&nbsp; Connectivity is the enabler for the world to grow and help solve each other&#8217;s problems. Just like the railroad in the 1800s, the network has transformed how people connect.&nbsp; </p>

<p>But it has gone even further by transforming how we communicate and collaborate; from both an innovation and sustainability perspective. </p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-08-03T16:24:57+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Smart Grids: Dept of Energy Report &amp;amp; Cisco Thoughts, Part 1</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/smart_grids_dept_of_energy_report_cisco_thoughts_part_1/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/smart_grids_dept_of_energy_report_cisco_thoughts_part_1/</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>The Dept of Energy has released in July 2009 its <a href="http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/SGSRMain_090707_lowres.pdf" title="Smart Grid System Report">Smart Grid System Report</a>.&nbsp; While many industry observers and experts have provided observations and predictions about Smart Grid adoption, this report offers an excellent 20 point summary of both current penetration of various Smart Grid components and predictions on trending for them looking forward.</p>

<p>In Part 1 of this blog series, I&#8217;ll focus on those areas rated Moderate today and/or have a Moderate to High trend rating.&nbsp; (Note: the 20 Smart Grid components are grouped into categories of Coordination Regimes, Distributed Energy Technologies, and Transmission/Distribution Infrastructure)
</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-07-28T16:24:35+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>EU and US Rapprochement on Climate Change</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/eu_and_us_rapprochement_on_climate_change/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/gov/comments/eu_and_us_rapprochement_on_climate_change/</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" style="padding-right:5px" src="http://tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:R9XTvxrY0nldyM:http://www.equidblog.com/uploads/image/climate-change.jpg" />I have just returned from Washington D.C., and it is refreshing to see an era of closer cooperation between the U.S. and Europe, not to mention the rest of the world, on climate change. As the U.S. delayed meaningful action on climate change for the past 15 years, the EU has set an ambitious target to reduce member states&#8217; CO2 emissions by 20% from 1990 levels by 2020 &#8211; the so-called 20/20/20 initiative. The EU also created the European Trading System (ETS), the world&#8217;s first platform for trading of carbon credits. </p>

<p>By placing climate change high on his domestic and foreign policy agendas, President Obama has changed the dynamics of climate discussions with the EU and in global climate negotiations, generally. His administration is fully re-engaged in UN negotiations and, along with Congress, is moving forward with domestic cap-and-trade legislation. Domestic legislation would impose mandatory caps on U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and set a target to cut emissions by 17% by 2020 and 83% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. The recent economic stimulus package includes $15bn for alternative energy development, more fuel efficient cars and a &#8220;smart grid&#8221; to bring them together. </p>

<p>The US and European are taking different approaches to solving global warming. While the Obama Administration presents reducing greenhouse gas emissions in terms of opportunities through the power of technology and the creation of a green economy, the EU is mainly focused on shorter-term opportunities to conserve, reining in electricity consumption and using less fuel by driving less and using more fuel-efficient, smaller cars, etc.</p>

<p>There is, however, a convergence of EU and U.S. long-term goals on climate change, and this is good news.</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-07-21T15:44:49+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>