Cisco Blogs


Cisco Blog > High Performance Computing Networking

Can I MPI_SEND (and MPI_RECV) with a count larger than 2 billion?

May 17, 2014 at 5:13 am PST

This question is inspired by the fact that the “count” parameter to MPI_SEND and MPI_RECV (and friends) is an “int” in C, which is typically a signed 4-byte integer, meaning that its largest positive value is 231, or about 2 billion.

However, this is the wrong question.

The right question is: can MPI send and receive messages with more than 2 billion elements?

Read More »

Tags: , , ,

Open MPI 1.7.5 released

March 21, 2014 at 6:46 am PST

After a metric ton of work by the entire community, Open MPI has released version 1.7.5.

Among the zillions of minor updates and new enhancements are two major new features:

  1. MPI-3.0 conformance
  2. OpenSHMEM support (Linux only)

See this post on the Open MPI announcement list for more details.

Read More »

Tags: , , ,

MPI Forum: What’s Next?

February 28, 2013 at 11:27 pm PST

Now that we’re just starting into the MPI-3.0 era, what’s next?

The MPI Forum is still having active meetings.  What is left to do?  Isn’t MPI “done”?

Nope.  MPI is an ever-changing standard to meet the needs of HPC.  And since HPC keeps changing, so does MPI.

Read More »

Tags: , ,

The MPI C++ bindings are gone: what does it mean to you?

October 19, 2012 at 5:00 am PST

Jeff Hammond at Argonne tells me that there’s some confusion in the user community about MPI and C++.  I explained how/why we got here in my first post; let Jeff (Hammond) and I now explain what this means to you.

The short version is: DON’T PANIC.

MPI implementations that provided the C++ bindings will likely continue to do so for quite a while.  I know that we have no intention of removing them from Open MPI any time soon, for example.  The MPICH guys have told me the same.

I’ll discuss below what this means to both applications that are written in C++, and applications that use the MPI C++ bindings. Read More »

Tags: , ,

The MPI C++ bindings: what happened, and why?

October 16, 2012 at 5:00 am PST

Jeff Hammond at Argonne tells me that there’s some confusion in the user community about MPI and C++.

Let me see if I can clear up some of the issues.

In this blog entry, I’ll describe what has happened to the C++ bindings over time (up to and including their removal in MPI-3), and why.  In a second blog entry, I’ll describe what this means to real-world C++ MPI applications.

Read More »

Tags: , ,