Last week, we looked at the question “How close to the phones does the CUCM cluster have to be?” There was no easy or set answer to this question, but we acknowledged right at the start that minimizing the number of clusters is probably a good idea. So why, then, does Cisco IT have so many clusters?
It’s a critical time for enterprise IT as new mobile devices from Apple, Samsung and Google enter the market and operating systems are updated almost weekly. Apart from the new color and form factor options, this round of new technology features new operating systems and a proliferation of app updates, which IT leaders must be prepared to meet head on.
It’s an exciting time for mobile technology, but it’s also an important time for enterprises to look at not only meet the demands of today’s mobile-enabled workforce, but tomorrow’s as well. Basic mobility functionality is not and will not be enough, and a solid framework must be put in place to support the growth.
In this inaugural post of a four-part Network Matters blog series, I’ll be discussing how IT leaders can rely on a network, built for all kinds of devices, to simplify the process of onboarding new mobile technology and free up precious IT resources. I would like to provide you with a deeper look at how having the right network in place can help ease the challenges of tomorrow that will be presented to IT departments due to device evolution and enable a culture of self-service for employee-owned devices.
The first things involved in designing a Unified Communications network are deciding where to put the Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) clusters, and how many clusters to have. And some of the major factors to consider are “Where are the phones? How many are there, and how close to the phones does a cluster have to be?” Read More »
Looking at the history of video collaboration there are a few identifiable transition points. The introduction of audio and video delivery over IP networks created opportunities for widespread affordable deployments and the video conferencing market began to expand. The scale of deployments, however, was in general neither large nor pervasive. In 2006/2007 new offerings (like the CTS 3000 from Cisco’s TelePresence team) introduced highly reliable, full HD (1080p), full motion (30fps) experiences with a level of simplicity making it operable by any user irrespective of technical knowledge. As Full HD became available across the breadth of video conferencing platforms, the whole market rapidly doubled over the following two to three years. This created another market pillar in collaboration.
Push the clock forward 6 or so years to today…
The distinction between video conferencing, unified communications and web conferencing is now very blurred:
- The user community has matured. They are no longer satisfied with connecting over audio, video or content. They want to achieve the startup experience of small, tightly connected teams across a geographically dispersed workforce. This means leveraging all of the above features where and when needed, in a simple and intuitive way.
- IM, presence, audio, video and content collaboration are becoming Read More »
This is the fourth post in a series from Dimension Data and Cisco Channels looking at user adoption and integration of unified communications and collaboration (UC&C) solutions. Findings stem from Dimension Data’s 2013 Global UC&C Survey, developed with ICT researcher Ovum and featuring responses from more than 2,700 participants in 18 countries across 20 vertical industries.
In a previous blog post based on this research, we heard about evidence that the implementation of some technologies is no longer the end goal in UC&C but have become a ‘ticket to the game’. In this most recent blog, Nagi Kasinadhuni, general manager converged communications and customer interaction solutions, has expanded on those ideas with his opinion on where this will lead clients in the future.
According to Kasinadhuni, when studying the UC&C study closely, some interesting nuances can be seen. In general, his opinion is that the decision maker survey is predictable, except in areas or markets where the adoption of bring your own device (BYOD) is high. High growth markets also tend to have higher BYOD adoption rates as opposed to more mature markets. Read More »