<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cisco Blog &#187; NUMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cisco.com/tag/numa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cisco.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Latency Analogies (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/latency-analogies-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/latency-analogies-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUNA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=108123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a prior blog post, <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/latency-analogies/">I talked about latency analogies</a> .  I compared levels of latencies to your home, your neighborhood, a far-away neighborhood, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/latency-analogies-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latency Analogies</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/latency-analogies/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/latency-analogies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUNA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=108092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Multiple readers have told me that it is difficult for them to understand and/or visualize the effects of latency on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/latency-analogies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Process and memory affinity: why do you care?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/process-and-memory-affinity-why-do-you-care/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/process-and-memory-affinity-why-do-you-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hwloc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process affinity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=99160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve written about <a title="NUMA effects" href="http://blogs.cisco.com/tag/numa/">NUMA effects</a> and <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/tag/process-affinity/">process affinity</a> on this blog lots of times in the past.  It&#8217;s a complex topic that has a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/process-and-memory-affinity-why-do-you-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Process Affinity in OMPI v1.7 (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/process-affinity-in-ompi-v1-7-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/process-affinity-in-ompi-v1-7-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hwloc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open MPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process affinity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=82213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/process-affinity-in-ompi-v1-7-part-1/">In my last post</a> , I described the Simple mode of Open MPI v1.7&#8242;s process affinity system. The Simple mode is actually quite flexible, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/process-affinity-in-ompi-v1-7-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Process Affinity in OMPI v1.7 (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/process-affinity-in-ompi-v1-7-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/process-affinity-in-ompi-v1-7-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open MPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process affinity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=82191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/taking-mpi-process-affinity-to-the-next-level/">In my last post</a> , I mentioned that we just finished a complete revamp of the Open MPI process affinity system, and provided only [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/process-affinity-in-ompi-v1-7-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking MPI Process Affinity to the Next Level</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/taking-mpi-process-affinity-to-the-next-level/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/taking-mpi-process-affinity-to-the-next-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hwloc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open MPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process affinity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=81694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Process affinity is a hot topic.  With commodity servers getting more and more complex internally (think: NUMA and NUNA), placing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/taking-mpi-process-affinity-to-the-next-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Registered memory imbalances</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/registered-memory-imbalances/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/registered-memory-imbalances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=74262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/tag/rdma/">prior blog posts</a> , I&#8217;ve talked about the implications of registered memory for both MPI applications and implementations. Here&#8217;s another fun implication [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/registered-memory-imbalances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open MPI v1.5 processor affinity options</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/open-mpi-v1-5-processor-affinity-options/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/open-mpi-v1-5-processor-affinity-options/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hwloc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open MPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process affinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor affinity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=63117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we feature a deep-dive guest post from <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ralph-castain/a/69b/a5b" target="_blank">Ralph Castain</a> , Senior Architecture in the Advanced R&#38;D group at <a href="http://www.greenplum.com/" target="_blank">Greenplum</a> , an EMC [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/open-mpi-v1-5-processor-affinity-options/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hardware Locality 1.2.1 and 1.3rc1 released</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/hardware-locality-1-2-1-and-1-3rc1-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/hardware-locality-1-2-1-and-1-3rc1-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hwloc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=40515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the vein of awesome software releases (ahem&#8230;), Hardware Locality (hwloc) v1.2.1 has been released.  As the &#8220;.1&#8243; implies, this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/hardware-locality-1-2-1-and-1-3rc1-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Memory Affinity</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/more-on-memory-affinity/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/more-on-memory-affinity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hwloc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process affinity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=23945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a great comment chain on my prior post (&#8220; <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/unexpected-linux-memory-migration/">Unexpected Linux Memory Migration</a> &#8220;) which brought out a number of good points. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/more-on-memory-affinity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
