<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cisco Blog &#187; MPICH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cisco.com/tag/mpich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cisco.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 01:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>MPICH 3.0 RC released</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpich-3-0-rc-released/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpich-3-0-rc-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPICH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=91963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MPICH folks <a href="http://www.mpich.org/2012/11/12/mpich-3-0rc1-released-nov-13-2012/" target="_blank">have released an RC candidate for MPICH 3.0</a> : A new preview release of MPICH, 3.0rc1, is now available for download. The primary focus of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpich-3-0-rc-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>mpicc != mpicc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpicc-is-not-equal-to-mpicc/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpicc-is-not-equal-to-mpicc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPICH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open MPI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=43418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last post, I talked about <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/why-mpi-wrapper-compilers-are-good-for-you/">why MPI wrapper compilers are Good for you</a> .  The short version is that it is faaar easier to use a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpicc-is-not-equal-to-mpicc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why MPI &#8220;wrapper&#8221; compilers are Good for you</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/why-mpi-wrapper-compilers-are-good-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/why-mpi-wrapper-compilers-are-good-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPICH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open MPI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=43411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2011/09/17390.php" target="_blank">An interesting thread</a> on the Open MPI user&#8217;s mailing list came up the other day: a user wanted <a href="http://www.open-mpi.org/" target="_blank">Open MPI&#8217;s</a> &#8220;mpicc&#8221; wrapper compiler to accept [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/why-mpi-wrapper-compilers-are-good-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
