<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cisco Blog &#187; MPI-3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cisco.com/tag/mpi-3-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cisco.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>MPI Forum: What&#8217;s Next?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-forum-whats-next/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-forum-whats-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=104033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that we&#8217;re just starting into the <a title="MPI-3.0 has passed!" href="http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-3-0-has-passed/">MPI-3.0 era</a> , what&#8217;s next? The MPI Forum is still having active meetings.  What is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-forum-whats-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The MPI C++ bindings are gone: what does it mean to you?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/the-mpi-c-bindings-are-gone-what-does-it-mean-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/the-mpi-c-bindings-are-gone-what-does-it-mean-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=86646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.alcf.anl.gov/staff-directory/jeff-hammond" target="_blank">Jeff Hammond at Argonne</a> tells me that there&#8217;s some confusion in the user community about MPI and C++.  I explained how/why we got here [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/the-mpi-c-bindings-are-gone-what-does-it-mean-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The MPI C++ bindings: what happened, and why?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/the-mpi-c-bindings-what-happened-and-why/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/the-mpi-c-bindings-what-happened-and-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=86659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.alcf.anl.gov/staff-directory/jeff-hammond" target="_blank">Jeff Hammond at Argonne</a>  tells me that there&#8217;s some confusion in the user community about MPI and C++. Let me see if I can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/the-mpi-c-bindings-what-happened-and-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPI-3.0 has passed!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-3-0-has-passed/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-3-0-has-passed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=83637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re here at the MPI Forum in Vienna where the Forum has just <a href="http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mpi-forum/2012/09/2211.php" target="_blank">unanimously voted to accept the MPI-3.0 document</a> . Woo hoo!! This document caps a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-3-0-has-passed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPI-3.0 Draft 2 public comment period</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-3-0-draft-2-public-comment-period/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-3-0-draft-2-public-comment-period/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=78679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear MPI user, The MPI-Forum is about to ratify the MPI-3.0, a new version of the MPI standard.  As part [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-3-0-draft-2-public-comment-period/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MPI-3.0: What&#8217;s the holdup?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-3-whats-the-holdup/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-3-whats-the-holdup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=78217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few people have asked me questions about MPI-3 recently, such as: What took so long? Why isn&#8217;t another draft [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/mpi-3-whats-the-holdup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gettings towards an MPI-3.0 draft</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/gettings-towards-an-mpi-3-0-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/gettings-towards-an-mpi-3-0-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=77562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been a bit tardy with my blogging responsibilities of late; but only because I&#8217;ve been swamped with MPI stuff. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/gettings-towards-an-mpi-3-0-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recently Voted into MPI-3</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/recently-voted-into-mpi-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/recently-voted-into-mpi-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=57963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the January MPI Forum meeting, several proposals passed their 2nd votes, meaning that they are &#8220;in&#8221; MPI-3.  That being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/recently-voted-into-mpi-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lots coming up for MPI-3.0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/lots-coming-up-for-mpi-3-0/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/lots-coming-up-for-mpi-3-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=55826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The upcoming January 2012 MPI Forum meeting is the last meeting to get new material into the MPI-3.0 specification. Specifically, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/lots-coming-up-for-mpi-3-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>User-level timers for MPI</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/user-level-timers-for-mpi/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/user-level-timers-for-mpi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Squyres</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Performance Computing Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPI-3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=30510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fab Tillier (Microsoft MPI) and I recently proposed a set of user-level timers for MPI.  The following slides are an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/performance/user-level-timers-for-mpi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
