Cisco Blogs


Cisco Blog > High Performance Computing Networking

MPI-3.0 Draft 2 public comment period

August 3, 2012 at 5:17 am PST

Dear MPI user,

The MPI-Forum is about to ratify the MPI-3.0, a new version of the MPI standard.  As part of this process, we are soliciting feedback on the current draft standard.  The draft document can be found here:

http://meetings.mpi-forum.org/draft_standard/mpi3.0_draft_2.pdf

We are seeking the following feedback in particular:

  • Small requests/corrections that can be resolved before finishing 3.0.
  • Requests for clarification of unclear text or undefined behavior.
  • Undetected severe inconsistencies or bugs that may delay the standard publication.
  • Wishes for additional enhancements or new functionality to be taken into account after 3.0 is published.

Please comment before Sep. 6, 2012 as follows:

  1. Subscribe to: http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-comments
  2. Then send your comments to: mpi-comments@lists.mpi-forum.org

Messages sent from an unsubscribed e-mail address will not be considered.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Best regards,
The MPI Forum

Tags: , ,

MPI-3.0: What’s the holdup?

July 31, 2012 at 7:48 am PST

A few people have asked me questions about MPI-3 recently, such as:

  1. What took so long?
  2. Why isn’t another draft version of MPI-3.0 available yet?
  3. When do you expect the final version of the MPI-3.0 document to be available?
  4. When do you expect MPI-3.0 implementations to be available?

These are all good questions.  Let me answer each of them individually…

Read More »

Tags: , ,

MPI progress

July 26, 2012 at 6:20 pm PST

From my blog post about the upcoming MPI-3 draft spec, Geoffrey Irving asked a followup question:

Can you describe the difference between the current situation and true background progression? Does the lack of background progression mean having to occasionally explicitly relinquish control to MPI in order to let one-sided operations proceed? Once true background progression is in place, would it involve extra threads and context switching, or use some other mechanism?

A great question.  He asked it in the context of the new MPI-3 one-sided stuff, but it’s generally applicable for other MPI operations, too (even MPI_SEND / MPI_RECV).

Read More »

Tags: , , ,

EuroMPI 2012 Call for Participation

July 3, 2012 at 7:40 am PST


EuroMPI 2012 -- the prime meeting for researchers, developers, and students in message-passing parallel computing with MPI (and related paradigms) -- calls for active participation in the conference which will take place from September 23rd to September 26th in Vienna, Austria, at the Austrian Academy of Sciences.

Read More »

Tags: , ,

Hardware vs. software: user questions (part 2)

June 29, 2012 at 5:00 am PST

In my prior blog entry, I answered the first of Durga C.’s questions to me.  Here’s all three of his questions:

  1. What is the role of the hardware in an RDMA transaction?  In other words, why does one need special hardware (e.g., InfiniBand, iWARP, RoCE, etc.) hardware to do RDMA as opposed to a “normal” Ethernet NIC? (see prior blog entry)
  2. Further, can you explain why pure software solutions (e.g., Open-MX) are better than nothing when you don’t have hardware support?
  3. Also, what is the difference between “RDMA” and “RMA”?

Let’s explore the last two of those questions. Read More »

Tags: , , , , ,