Every year a new attendance record is set at Mobile World Congress by networkers participating from over 200 countries across the globe. This grand attendance of industry-defining vendors, technology enthusiasts and exhibitors triggers an explosive growth in the number of Wi-Fi capable devices being brought to the event. For MWC 2014, Cisco partnered with Fira Gran Via and GSMA to pull off one of the most successful high density Wi-Fi network deployments in the history of global tech events. This blog kicks off a series to provide a glimpse of behind the network, into the design stages, and the course of actions undertaken to implement a robust high density wireless network which served more than 22,000 concurrently connected unique devices and a total of 80,880 devices throughout the event. Full details in whitepaper here.
Setting the Scene
Divided into eight massive exhibition halls, Fira Gran Via covers around 3 million square feet (280,000 square meters) of area which also includes outdoor areas, restaurants, conference rooms, network lounges and a continuous elevated walkway flowing through the entire venue. Higher the environmental complexity, the more fun and challenging it is to achieve the right wireless design for a pervasive network that meets all the needs.
An aerial view of Mobile World Congress 2014 arena at Fira Gran Via, Barcelona
Generally, the physical design of large convention and exhibition halls bear an impish knack of unfavorable conditions for a ubiquitous high density Wi-Fi network, owing mostly to the lofty ceiling heights and construction components. Read More »
Tags: 2.4 GHz, access point, antenna, antennas, AP, architect, barcelona, beamforming, cell isolation, cleanair, ClientLink, convention center, coverage, deployment, design, device, event, fira gran via, GHz, hardware, HD, HDX, high density, infrastructure, interference, management, mobile, mobile world congress, mobility, mwc, network, networking, radio resource management, rf, RRM, rx-sop, site survey, site visit, tech, technology, venue, wi-fi, wifi, wireless
It’s always interesting and often entertaining to observe how competitors promote their products and what they choose to focus on—and more importantly, what they choose not to focus on and what they hope people won’t ask questions about.
Consider yet again how a competitor chooses to position their “purpose built” AP vs. the Cisco Aironet 3700 802.11ac Access Point Series.
This competitor frequently (and somewhat obsessively) points out that its 802.11ac AP has dual “active” 800 MHz cores while the Cisco AP3700 has only one “active” 800 MHz core. This is not completely true since it completely overlooks the fact that the Cisco AP3700 also has a dedicated CPU core and DSP for each radio subsystem.
Furthermore, it also overlooks that the dual “active” cores in the competitor’s AP share 512 MB of DRAM. The single “active” core of the AP3700 has dedicated 512 MB of DRAM. Also each radio subsystem has a dedicated 128 MB DRAM (for 768 MB total DRAM in the AP3700).
Why is all of this important? Read More »
Tags: 11ac, 802.11ac, access point, AP, architecture, ASIC, client, compute, Computing, design, device, DRAM, efficiency, hardware, HD, HDX, high density, Industry, infrastructure, LAN, MB, memory, memory management, Mhz, mobile, mobility, network, networking, performance, rf, system, wi-fi, wifi, wireless, wlan
Usability testing a support mobile page at the NetVet lounge with NetVet Mike Williams.
Recently at CiscoLive!, we spent a full week with customers and partners doing in-detail usability tests of Cisco.com and some of our mobile sites and apps. This is one of the main methods we use to make our web and mobile easier.
What’s a usability test? Something different than you might think. While you’ve probably heard of other research techniques like focus groups and surveys, usability tests and listening labs are a way for us to learn through observing how people use our sites: We have someone sit down in front of the screen and ask them to do a task that they would in their real work day. This could be solving a support question, researching a new product, finding the right download, investigating a new API, or any number of other things.
Here’s the difference between a usability test vs. a focus group or survey: In a focus group, a facilitator often throws out an idea or scenario and gets a group of people to comment on it. The people in the room will tell you what they might like… they will build on others comments… they may give you some great ideas! But, you won’t really be learning by observing. You won’t understand the kinds of things they will actually do in real life, because you’re asking them what they think they would do. You aren’t observing.
But when we observe people using our mobile apps or web sites, we can see lots of things. For instance:
- We can see the areas that trip them up (even if they report to us that the experience is just fine)
- We can see the areas where they’re getting the wrong result (even if they think they’re getting the right one).
- Or sometimes even technical problems that we see and can troubleshoot, but they can’t.
We recommend running usability tests or listening labs at multiple stages for major projects:
- At the beginning of the project – when you want to understand current state and also look at how competitive or best practice sites and apps are doing.
- In the middle – while you’re still developing, and direct observation and feedback can make a huge difference
- Before release – so you can catch any last-minute problems
- After release – because sometimes when outside factors and environments affect the app or web experience in way you can’t expect (for instance, how and whether people can find your site topic on Google or other search engines, and how they interact with the results).
Even though this sounds like a lot of testing, there are some new techniques you can use to get real user feedback very quickly – within hours or days. I’ll talk about that in a future post.
Meanwhile, keep testing. And, remember baseball legend Yogi Berra, who said:
“You can observe a lot by watching!”
Tags: cisco.com, design, mobile, usability, user experience
Johns Hopkins Medicine is one of the leading health-care providers in the US. The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine is consistently ranked as one of the top Medical Schools in the US and the Johns Hopkins Hospital is consistently ranked #1 in the US for 21 years in a row! In a previous blog in 2012, we described how the Cisco Wireless LAN controller 7.5 release enables wireless networks to recover with no client re-authentication in the event of a primarily controller failure. In this blog, I will share more details about unified access deployment at the Johns Hopkins Hospital with particular focus on the High Availability design.
Patients are the focus at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Johns Hopkins uses state-of-the-art technology in their hospitals to ensure that patients get the latest advances from surgical tools, radiologic imaging suites with the best diagnostic capabilities to something as humane as sound-absorbing private rooms for each patient. Read More »
Tags: access, aireOS, blade, Cisco, client, controller, deployment, design, device, diagnostic, equipment, health care, healthcare, High Availability, hospital, IOS, johns hopkins, LAN, mdf, medical, Mission Critical, mobility, NCV, network, patient, re-authentication, release, text, unified, Voice, voip, vss, wi-fi, wifi, wireless, WiSM2, wlan
A lot can change in 25 years. At the first Cisco Live (then known as Networkers conferences) in 1989, 200 geeks gathered for the inaugural event. Fast forward to three weeks ago, when we welcomed a whopping 25,000 attendees into the arms of our namesake, beautiful San Francisco.
We heard there was some interest in how the network performed at the show, so I wanted to share some of the interesting statistics about the network at Cisco Live! I shudder at the thought of the ancient network from 25 years ago. So here we go:
Wi-Fi Client Devices
This year we saw 30,705 unique devices, with 7000 in the theater for John Chambers’ keynote.
# of Unique Clients
# of Sessions
# of Unique Users
# of Unique APs
Avg Users per AP
Max. Concurrent Connected Wi-Fi Devices
There was a peak of 14216 concurrently connected device at SF this year.
Read More »
Tags: #CLUS, 10G, 802.11, access point, analytic, antenna, AP, application, Application Visibility and Control, attendee, AVC, catalyst, Cisco, cisco live, client, client composition, concurrent, Conference, control, controller, deploy, design, device, Gbps, Geek, GHz, HDX, High Availability, high density, infrastructure, IPv6, LAN, laptop, legacy data rate, mobile, moscone, mse, network, networkers, peak, peak throughput, phone, san francisco, show, switch, TBps, TByte, throughput, traffic, unique user, user, visibility, wifi, wireless, wlan