I don’t know about you, but I can get easily frustrated trying to sort out home network issues. When my connectivity goes wonky, I’m left wondering if it’s my modem/router, my service provider, or user error (hard to believe, I know). And that’s coming from someone with an engineering degree. Things would be simpler and less aggravating if I only had to place one phone call to problem solve. Knowing how much this puts me out on just a personal level, I can’t imagine why some businesses would elect to deal with networking on a much grander scale using a similar model of various sources of accountability.
When you rely on multiple vendors to provision your network architecture, accountability becomes diluted. While you might think you’re mitigating risk by not putting all your eggs in one basket, you’re actually adding to the complexity, lengthening time for problem resolution, and ultimately, adding to your costs—thereby creating risks that can be even more problematic. But don’t take my word for it. Tune in to a special webcast featuring Deloitte Consulting at 8am, February 23. Deloitte will reveal its findings from an in-depth study comparing TCO and risk in single versus multivendor networks. In fact, here’s a quick preview:
You’ll also hear directly from two businesses that participated in the study: Pella Corporation and Cadence Design Systems. And, if you’re still a skeptic, join the live Q&A throughout the web cast, so you can pose your specific questions to experts from Deloitte and Cisco.
After you see the compelling results of this study, you might just find yourself single and loving it.