<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real World DNS Abuse: Finding Common Ground</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cisco.com/security/real-world-dns-abuse-finding-common-ground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/real-world-dns-abuse-finding-common-ground/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:57:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Zimmermann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/real-world-dns-abuse-finding-common-ground/#comment-697104</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Zimmermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 23:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=93122#comment-697104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting and informative posting. I find the DNSSEC issuse regarding &#039;EDNS0&#039;, and the problem with a system being used/drained by the  max. UDP payload size advertizing &amp; amplyfying especially interesting. It will be interesting to see the next move from &#039;the inventor&#039;! I&#039;ll have to look a bit deeper into DNSSEC, a bit in closest future. I must re-read 4033 &amp; 4641 ASAP.  Think there might be another way to &#039;pile on&#039; even more,. Must toy more with the UDP Payload technique even morefirst though! . Musttest , test...! And thank&#039;s, great work Mike &amp; Andrea! Thank&#039;s for sharing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting and informative posting. I find the DNSSEC issuse regarding &#8216;EDNS0&#8242;, and the problem with a system being used/drained by the  max. UDP payload size advertizing &amp; amplyfying especially interesting. It will be interesting to see the next move from &#8216;the inventor&#8217;! I&#8217;ll have to look a bit deeper into DNSSEC, a bit in closest future. I must re-read 4033 &amp; 4641 ASAP.  Think there might be another way to &#8216;pile on&#8217; even more,. Must toy more with the UDP Payload technique even morefirst though! . Musttest , test&#8230;! And thank&#8217;s, great work Mike &amp; Andrea! Thank&#8217;s for sharing!
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://blogs.cisco.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',697104)" src="http://blogs.cisco.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-697104">3</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
