<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPv6 Myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cisco.com/security/ipv6-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/ipv6-myths/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:09:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Dobbins</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/ipv6-myths/#comment-115814</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Dobbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 04:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=20861#comment-115814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, getting rid of NAT increases one&#039;s security posture, as the stateful DoS vector represented by NAT is eliminated from the network.

Unfortunately, the advent of IPv6 will result in *more* undesirable state in the network, in the form of CGNs on the IPv4 side and 6-to-4 gateways.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, getting rid of NAT increases one&#8217;s security posture, as the stateful DoS vector represented by NAT is eliminated from the network.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the advent of IPv6 will result in *more* undesirable state in the network, in the form of CGNs on the IPv4 side and 6-to-4 gateways.
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://blogs.cisco.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',115814)" src="http://blogs.cisco.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-115814">1</span> like</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
