In Between the Numbers: When a Blink of an Eye is Too Slow
A long-standing hypothesis around here is that we’ve entered a new age of internet-shaped shopper expectations.
The thinking is that, in this age of Google, Amazon, and ubiquitous connectivity, an increasing number of Western shoppers now expect the entire world to work like an iPad 3 hooked to a steroidal data pipe.
Where, with a flick of the finger, anything and everything can be found. In multiple choice. Where comparative price and product data is there for all to see. Where transparency is equated with authenticity, and authenticity with trust.
And where everything moves ahead at blink-of-an-eye speed.
Evidence of the latter was found this past week on the front page of the New York Times.
Steve Lohr (“For Impatient Web Users, an Eye Blink Is Just Too Long to Wait”) reported that Google researchers found that a delay of four hundred milliseconds or more between key stroke and computer response – that’s four-tenths of a second, literally the blink of an eye – will cause people to search less.
According to a computer scientist at Microsoft, a response time of 250 milliseconds is now the magic number “for a competitive advantage” on the web.
Truth be told, our impatient society will wait more than a few blinks for a big video file to download. But Google research shows that four of five online users will click away if a video stalls while loading.
In this day and age, it’s lack of speed that kills.
Worth remembering as one designs the next web experience.
Worth remembering as one designs the next store experience.
Ladies and gentlemen, start your engines.
p.s. I will be speaking at the Catch Em and Keep Em Webcast on Thursday March 8th, 2012 about our research released at NRF 2012 back January. We will talk about what in our research show how retailers can catch and keep the channel hopping consumers. You can register to watch the event here.Tags: