May 31, 2008

Rise of the Machines


I’ve been thinking about how machine-to-machine (M2M) communications will evolve, and what it will mean for the network. We seven billion humans think we’re the majority, with about one billion of us connected to the Internet and more than three billion chatting on cell phones. But there’s another population that overshadows us: Machines. By some counts, there are 10 times as many of them as of us - over 70 billion. Most of them are not yet connected, but this will change. 

Cars, irrigation systems, and weather sensors are just the beginning. Proprietary, legacy systems are converging on IP due to cost efficiencies and benefits of standardization. New technologies such as Zigbee promise to tie together disparate devices in a cost-effective mesh. 

We sometimes joke about having a constant caffeine connection, where you’re hit with another infusion just as your energy starts to dip. But there is something to be said about delivery trucks being able to plan based on a real-time view of inventory or to simply operate more safely thanks to an automated monitoring system that can detect issues with operation or maintenance. In fact, Computerworld’s Rob Mitchell just wrote a great article about this very topic.

Businesses and consumers alike can expect to see machines figuring more and more prominently in the future, which is not so far off. RSR Wireless News reported a week ago that the market for cellular machine-to-machine communications modules is expected to grow to nearly 80 million shipments in 2013, according to a new study from ABI Research. Imagine your refrigerator contacting your local grocery store to let it know that you’re running low on milk or eggs. Or, if you’ve ever been frustrated by a vending machine that has run out of your favorite beverage or snack, help is on the way. You get the idea. So what does this mean for the network?

First off, we’re not talking about bandwidth. Or at least, not always. A coke machine is not on IP-TV, unless you want to be entertained while waiting for the cold stuff. Now think of the corner gas station. You may not have noticed, but small displays with news and ads are popping up on top of gas pumps—at least in my neighborhood. This could be an opportunity for ad insertion. But the real challenge is in management and security. 

How do we effectively control these devices? How do we provide this control to those (and only those) who require it—both at the desk and on the road? We need to be smart about balancing access with security. For instance, a university or government may want access to data from weather, irrigation, and soil sensors for climate analysis. So what’s the best way to provide IP addresses to all those endpoints? How do we prioritize critical systems against those requiring best-effort? 

At Cisco, we’re addressing these issues. And, we’re adapting what we’ve learned in delivering the Internet to the first billion users, to the next 100 billion—be they human or machine.

But I’d like to hear from you. Tell me about your experiences or observations with M2M. What security concerns come up for you?

Marie Hattar Posted by Marie Hattar at 06:42PM PST

Permalink, Comments (6), Trackbacks (0)

Tags: m2m machine-to-machine security zigbee

6 Comments

John Reynolds Jun 16, 2009

Marie, As you discuss M2M is a big space depending on your definition.  In Canada yesterday the big three telco’s have joined up to help commoditise M2M and use the handset as the payment delivery vehicle.  Our company has been involved in the M2M space with telematics and growing use of in-vehicle devices for Governments (UK Government is a client) and for Pay As You Go insurance applicaitons.

The wireless carriers in North America, Europe and the Middle East are fighting for the right to get our data business as these solutions can transmit a lot of data.

M2M solutions for Smart meter networks will involve MESH networks where only a few have live connections back to hosted servers and the rest use other wireless protocols.

my two cents, love to hear back from you or others.

John Reynolds

Marie Hattar Jun 18, 2009

John, thanks for your comment. It’s an interesting discussion as we look into the future of this. Right now, a lot of people are focused on the challenge of video, which requires the network to manage and move large chunks of time-sensitive information between a relatively low number of network endpoints at any one time. As we move toward M2M, though, the network will need to support what will likely be a staggering increase in the number of small chunks of information moving among literally billions of endpoints. And these types of exchanges, while small, occur continually, with a wide range of time sensitivities.

A network needs to manage both extremes. Just as video is driving new networking advancements, M2M networks are pushing network technology in new directions. Certainly, the sheer endpoint population growth will hasten IPv6 adoption. While M2M exchanges may not drive bandwidth requirements like video, the dramatic increase in the number of interactions will demand efficiency improvements in connection management and session/information integrity capabilities.

With M2M, networks will be even more reliant on automated deployment, operations, and problem resolution. Think of the challenge of diagnosing and fixing a “simple” problem with thousands of hidden sensors that are sending data in multiple directions. Think of a machine controlling water flow, safety mechanisms, a manufacturing line robot, or a moving vehicle. Reliable, immediate response and interaction become critical requirements, not merely expectations. Our early Smart Grid work and utility company interactions are bearing this out. And this is just the start! 
Care to share more about M2M applications with in-vehicle devices?

John Reynolds Jul 30, 2009

Marie, the scope of possibilites is daunting.  Our work in M2M is about vehicle data (diagnostics) and vehicle usage, while we are working with vehicle to vehicle communication and the implications for mesh networks to enable this, as well as the current technologies (gprs, WiMax, active RFID and basic wifi).  This has applications for safety (notification of a road issue 2km ahead) or for user features (better traffic flow, or communication to an individual in a specific car). 

You mentioned device management and security - who does own the data that moves through a mesh network (vehicles or homes, or tablet PC’s, Kindle devices).  While infrastructure planning is essential so is the business case to ensure these ideas take shape and are implemented.

Your device management comments of course can relate to Smart Grid developments which I believe Cisco is getting some US Stimulus funding to do even more research on - that must be exciting!

Rise of the Machines is an apt title for your blog article….it is coming and resistance is futile (to borrow a phrase).

Mark Leary Aug 28, 2009

John, I was able to spend some time on your company’s site recently. In looking at DriveSync, I can see where concerns about data ownership would arise.

I live in Massachusetts, where the auto insurance practices have changed dramatically in the past few years. Vehicle tracking is one of those “Big Brother is watching” issues that has stirred hot debate in our state. A few years back, we saw how heated this debate could become when Massachusetts Dept of Public Works wanted to install vehicle tracking systems in snow plows owned and operator by private contractors. The drivers argued privacy. The state argued efficiency. All the while, tax payers screamed for safe roads. I did note the security measures you offer with DriveSync. Interesting how the data ownership and access debate can be a bigger barrier to implementation than the technology itself. 

One last thing… I also noted your company’s in-vehicle Heart Monitoring System. Did you see the recent Cisco Platform blog on heart monitoring? It is at:

http://blogs.cisco.com/security/comments/security_and_network-based_healthcare/

This blog entry was prompted by news of active wireless heart monitoring. Talk about security issues! WOW!

Thanks for contributing to our Platform blog. We certainly appreciate the interest and support.

John Reynolds Oct 19, 2009

Marie, While not your area can you provide me a contact in your Cisco Smart Business Communications System Product Management/Development area.  IMS has a new product not-yet-announced that would enhance that Unified Messaging Solution perfectly.  Let me know, or please pass along my contact info, thanks,

John

Sydney Monis Nov 3, 2009

It surely is amazing how machines have evolved from mere gym instruments(these are machines after all) to advanced robots.
Life surely has become easier and unemployment is rising due to the intelligence capability of these bots.
Nice Article by the way. Enjoyed reading it smile

Post a comment

Join the conversation!

We encourage your comments, questions and suggestions. All comments are moderated and will appear as soon as they are approved by the moderator.

Please increase the validity of your comment by providing a valid first and last name. Spam, off-topic or offensive comments will not be posted.

Name:
Email:
URL:

Comments:

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Post a trackback

Ping this URL to post a trackback:
http://blogs.cisco.com/trackback/6027/Kqy0uqYT/

More blog posts

Previous post:
Cisco #1 in Enterprise Voice AND #1 Enterprise Telephony Worldwide

Next post:
We-C: Innovative Program for At-Risk Youth in San Jose, CA

Recent posts:
November 2009 Archive