June 09, 2006

WSJ Net Neutrality Editorial by Cisco: “Neutrality Check”


SAN JOSE, CA - For the record, I wanted to bring your attention to the op-ed published yesterday in the Wall Street Journal by Cisco SVP, Chief Development Officer and President of Linksys, Charlie Giancarlo.  It lays out our argument for why net neutrality is a bad idea.  By all accounts, it was widely circulated on Capitol Hill prior to the vote on HR5252, the bill that addressed net neutrality, and had a positive impact.  Net neutrality vote failed by an overwhelming margin (nearly 2/3’s of House voted against.)

Op-ed, in part, states: “Is regulation needed to accomplish ‘Net neutrality’? The prudent policy at this point would be not to regulate. First, the Internet is still in its adolescence, and it is undergoing rapid change. Regulation would lock in rules and practices that might seem correct today, but could create havoc tomorrow. Instead, we should allow the massive convergence to Internet technology to continue unabated, and regulators should address specific problems on a case-by-case basis.”

You can access the full op-ed here.  Paid subscription required.

John Earnhardt Posted by John Earnhardt at 05:35PM PST

Permalink, Comments (0), Trackbacks (0)

Tags:

Post a comment

Join the conversation!

We encourage your comments, questions and suggestions. All comments are moderated and will appear as soon as they are approved by the moderator.

Please increase the validity of your comment by providing a valid first and last name. Spam, off-topic or offensive comments will not be posted.

Name:
Email:
URL:

Comments:

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Post a trackback

Ping this URL to post a trackback:
http://blogs.cisco.com/trackback/5158/RTbE9Lg5/

More blog posts

Previous post:
Net Neutrality: Who's David? Who's Goliath?

Next post:
Guest Blogger: Charles H. Giancarlo on Net Neutrality

Recent posts:
November 2009 Archive