June 12, 2006

“The Internet’s Future: Congress Should Stay Out of Cyberspace”


SAN JOSE, CA - That is the title of today’s editorial by The Washington Post against regulating the Internet, i.e. against net neutrality.  The pro-net neutrality crowd is saying that when you have MoveOn.org and the Christian Coalition on one side of debate that you have to listen.  I would submit that when you have The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post editorializing on the same side of the issue that you really have to listen.

The editorial states, in part: “The weakest aspect of the neutrality case is that the dangers it alleges are speculative. It seems unlikely that broadband providers will degrade Web services that people want and far more likely that they will use non-neutrality to charge for upgrading services that depend on fast and reliable delivery, such as streaming high-definition video or relaying data from heart monitors. If this proves wrong, the government should step in. But it should not burden the Internet with preemptive regulation.”

Read the editorial here.  (Free registration is required at WashingtonPost.com.)

John Earnhardt Posted by John Earnhardt at 01:14PM PST

Permalink, Comments (0), Trackbacks (0)

Tags:

Post a comment

Join the conversation!

We encourage your comments, questions and suggestions. All comments are moderated and will appear as soon as they are approved by the moderator.

Please increase the validity of your comment by providing a valid first and last name. Spam, off-topic or offensive comments will not be posted.

Name:
Email:
URL:

Comments:

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


Post a trackback

Ping this URL to post a trackback:
http://blogs.cisco.com/trackback/5160/NnB6FPOY/

More blog posts

Previous post:
Guest Blogger: Charles H. Giancarlo on Net Neutrality

Next post:
Cisco's Robert Pepper in 'Network World' "Face-Off"

Recent posts:
November 2009 Archive