<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why You’ll Want LISP Routing – Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/why-youll-want-lisp-routing-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/why-youll-want-lisp-routing-part-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Sultan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/why-youll-want-lisp-routing-part-3/#comment-697080</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Sultan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=92436#comment-697080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are correct--good catch.  Thanks,

Omar]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct&#8211;good catch.  Thanks,</p>
<p>Omar
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://blogs.cisco.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',697080)" src="http://blogs.cisco.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-697080">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bishop (First Name)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/why-youll-want-lisp-routing-part-3/#comment-697055</link>
		<dc:creator>bishop (First Name)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=92436#comment-697055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; The MS now sends a map-notify message back to 10.100.10.21 and lets it know its no longer responsible for 172.16.4.7.

May be 10.100.19.21 instead 10.100.10.21?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; The MS now sends a map-notify message back to 10.100.10.21 and lets it know its no longer responsible for 172.16.4.7.</p>
<p>May be 10.100.19.21 instead 10.100.10.21?
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://blogs.cisco.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',697055)" src="http://blogs.cisco.com/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-697055">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
