I just perused a few press quotes on the recent vaporware Stratus announcement from my friends down the street. David Yen, executive vice president of the Data Center Business Group was quoted in eWeek and a few other magazines with the following comments. My feedback is in bold.The Stratus Project has been in the works for more than a year, says Yen, with the goal of creating a scalable, flat and lossless fabric that will carry all types of data center traffic via a single architecture at 10GB Ethernet access port speed. — ummm, we did that last year“Stratus extends Juniper’s high-performance networking core competencies into the datacenter,” Yen said. “It allows Juniper to enter a new addressable market space. We have no vested interest in prolonging suboptimal legacy architectures. We are in a unique position to revolutionize the datacenter.” Read: Juniper wants to obsolete your FIbreChannel SAN and Storage Infrastructure, and, coincidentally, without understanding the IT environment you are moving into, with no experience at all, you expect to disrupt it. Good luck.“œData centers will grow larger,” he said.”A new, adequate solution must be provided.” Read: We focus on adequacy, adequate is good enough. With the Nexus we focused on redefining, setting new performance and availability levels, and reshaping the data center network. “œIf you don’t support a converged fabric -- you’re limiting flexibility” within the data center, Yen said. I totally agree, want a job? Or a Nexus?
I sent a Tweet out this weekend that is turning out to be quickly prophetic: -- “Those most vocal against a new technology are those most afraid of its impact on their existence”. Thus was funny to note a recent blog post where one of our alliance partners made a comment that is unfortunately inaccurate. That the Nexus Family of LAN switches is not compatible with our other switches. I have reached out to them to correct it, but wanted to also clear the air a bit and of course set the record straight.The Nexus family of Data Center Switches is compatible with the Catalyst line, it also happens to be compatible with the IETF and IEEE standards as well as the pending ANSI T11 standards for FCoE. I know this has to be a hard thing for some to accept when they are pushing proprietary vendor lock-in technologies that waste power, cost more to implement, use too much fiber and copper, don’t support virtual machine mobility, can’t keep policies coherent during workload migration, expose security and compliance risks, and cause massive outages during upgrade. Sorry friend, I’ll prefer the interoperable, standards based, consistent user interface, model AND bring customer-focused innovations to market at the same time. dg
What’s not to love about Cannes, France: the food, the wine, the French Riviera, the Nexus 1000V….huh? Yes, this week, Cannes is home to VMworld Europe where all things VMware are under discussion.Folks lucky enough to be at the event have access to a hands-on lab where they get a chance to play with the 1000V. We ran over 80 people through the labs and have had to expand the demo pods to deal the overflow--kinda like Vegas, where attendees were stacked 4 deep once we unveiled the 1000V.Paul and Han, from the BU are onsite, running things. Perhaps, between bottles of wine, we can get them to post some more info on what customers are saying. In the interim, here are some thougths from one attendee.
All the dire predictions for the demise of cloud computing that came with yesterday’s GMail downtime were, to be honest, kinda comical. I mean, after all, its not like my Windows laptop ever needs rebooting or the Exchange server ever goes off-line.However, for cooler heads, it does bring up a good question: what are reasonable availability requirements for a cloud based app? Should they be any different (higher or lower) than for an app sitting on a server in your data center. Read More »
I recently read the opinion of the CEO from one of our competitors that FCoE is too costly and that the demand for convergence in the data center is slowing. It is hard to argue that worsening economic conditions might affect customer’s spending plans in the future.However, history has shown that network convergence saves money, both in capital and operational expenditures. Whether it was convergence of WAN technologies in the 1980s that led to the dominance of TCP/IP as the standard protocol for the Internet or the convergence of numerous LAN technologies to Ethernet in the 1990s that enabled the creation of hundreds of new products that have the now-ubiqutous RJ45 Ethernet jack.This past decade has been no different. The convergence of voice, video, and data networks has created a completely new industry and lowered the cost of communications for millions across the world. From Skype to Vonage to Telepresence, none would be possible without network convergence.So as we look forward to a new decade, why would we not expect data center networks to follow a similar path? And why would a certain CEO downplay convergence when he just closed a major acquisition that enables him to capitalize on it? Perhaps history is already repeating itself and he finds himself behind like many other competitors that clung to their legacy technologies a bit too long.If you’re curious about how FCoE and data center network convergence could save you money, check out our online calculator and plug in your real-world numbers and see if it makes sense for you.Also, be sure to check out this recent article from the FCIA that makes the case for FCoE.