This video captures one of the most compelling customer testimonials to date for our Nexus 1000V virtual switch, as we sit down with Sean Donaldson, Director of IT Infrastructure at Secure-24. Secure-24 provides managed hosting and private cloud computing for the enterprise level, business critical applications of large enterprise and middle-market companies.
During the course of this year we have seen the desktop virtualization market mature from tire kicking pilots to some pretty large deployments, including some over 10,000 seats. Cisco UCS has been a very popular platform for these deployments with hundreds of Citrix XenDesktop or VMware View implementations as you can learn from a recent video blog by our VDI product manager, Ashok Rajagopalan.
Latest UCS Innovations for VDI: And during the course of the year we have continued to innovate on the UCS platform to make sure it continues to support ever greater virtual desktop hosting scalability and simplicity, while also continuing to drive down implementation and operations costs. For example recent improvements include:
• 2-fold increases in UCS fabric capacity and 4 fold increase in server I/O capacity to allow more virtual desktops per server to be hosted without any performance degradation, even during boot or logon storms
• Improved Virtual NIC capabilities ensure the multitude of networks (client/LAN/SAN/NAS/Cluster etc.) that need to be supported in a virtual desktop environment get the quality of service each requires over a unified fabric
• Unified port capabilities, ensure a more cost effective solution that supports all traffic types 10GE/FC/FCOE/NFS/iSCSI through a common port
• Increases in desktop density and management domain scalability resulting in over 30,000 Windows 7 desktops supported in a single UCS management domain
• Advanced virtual services such as security (VSG), monitoring (vNAM) and WAN optimization (vWAAS) for more scalable, flexible and cost effective services.
Enterprise IT continues to spend nearly $15B of their hard-earned budgets every year in RISC/UNIX and mainframe hardware. The upfront expense combined with the proprietary lock-in on these platforms and associated maintenance and licensing costs is a mandate for IT to rethink their long term strategy. Many of these companies are already moving off the RISC/UNIX architectures due to high costs and uncertainty about their futures foreshadowed by missed deadlines, changes in roadmaps and discontinued hardware and software support. There is a strong and on-going market trend to migrate from proprietary architectures to the open Intel Xeon® based architecture, and the Cisco Unified Computing System is particularly well suited as a target platform for this purpose. In partnership with Intel, Cisco has developed a RISC/UNIX Migration Program (www.cisco.com/go/migratetoucs) that includes a complete set of Cisco Migration Services through Cisco AS and Partners to help IT organizations define and realize the business benefits of migrating to Cisco Unified Computing System.
I had a conversation recently with Patrick Buddenbaum , Director of Intel’s Datacenter and Connected Systems Group, and Cisco’s Scott Clark, VP, Enterprise DC Services, to discuss the RISC/UNIX migration program. Read on for a summary of this conversation.
” Scott : Satinder, why is Cisco UCS an ideal destination platform for a RISC/UNIX migration?
Far too often, technology transitions are highlighted by the new bells and whistles. This is great for advertising, where “NEW” is the allure. But it frequently leaves IT organizations wondering how they can transition from their current environments to the added business value that these technology transitions enable. In the 1st Part of this webinar series we explored why companies need to be aware of Cloud Computing and the types of problems it can solve for their business. The 2nd webinar in the series (“Overcoming Rigidity and Complexity“) will look at ways to manage the transition to Cloud Computing.
Cisco UCS Servers and Blade Server Evolution, part 1, as the title suggests, discussed blade server evolution and why Cisco UCS is a game changer. Now let’s talk about what the implications are for blade server TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) and how Cisco Unified Computing System scales vs. legacy blade architectures.
Blade Server TCO and Scale
Scale is the crux of the problem that has historically been the barrier for blade servers to deliver on their initial promise. Scale for I/O. Scale for Servers. Scale for Management. Cisco identified these shortfalls in the traditional legacy blade architecture and came to the marketplace with an innovative, game changing redefined architecture – Cisco UCS.
As discussed in “part 1”, to move the bar for blade chassis, we to better consolidate I/O, management and scale. Enter Cisco UCS. Deliver everything at scale: servers and I/O and blade chassis and management etc. Deliver a new design, rather than retreading an old dead end chassis ‘building block’ design.
Efficiency and Scale by Design
The requisite new design is what Cisco delivered. Cisco UCS is a variable chassis count, variable server count, variable I/O capacity, smart scaling architecture.
Figure 1 is the Cisco design, a converged I/O (FCoE – lossless FC and Enet combined) that scales. It provides easy, efficient infrastructure scaling across: multiple chassis, multiple servers, racks, rows and yes, it even includes the integration of rack servers into the solution.
Figure 1: Cisco UCS architecture – 10 x 8 blade chassis = 80 blade servers, 20 cables (add more I/O by simply adding cables – easy scaling)
Figure 2 is a Non-Converged legacy blade chassis I/O architecture. More = more… of everything. More chassis to hold more blades is OK, that makes sense. But more Switches? More cables? More points of Management? More complexity? Not too good.