Cisco Blogs

FCoE/8G FC Interop Results: Look who supports end users…and who doesn’t

- December 6, 2010 - 1 Comment

The Fibre Channel Industry Association (FCIA) announced the completion of FCoE/8GFC Plugfest held recently at the University of New Hampshire Interoperability Lab (UNH-IOL).   While it looks like many vendors are on top of FCOE/8G interop testing, several major vendors were conspicuously missing:

“Participating companies in the Plugfest included ATTO, Broadcom, Chelsio, Cisco, Emulex, Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Ixia, JDSU, LSI, Mellanox Technologies, NetApp, QLogic and SANBlaze Technology”.

 Why is Multi-Vendor Interoperability Important?

As customers transition to virtualized and cloud environments and attempt to wring the most out of their existing technology, multi-protocol environments are inevitable. The single biggest hurdle to overcome in multi-protocol environments (FC, FCoE, iSCSI, etc) is intelligent scaling — and intelligent scaling requires interoperability between legacy and virtualized environments. 

 Standards-based architectures — The only way to ensure Interop!

Because most customer environments are heterogeneous in nature, a standards-based approach is paramount to enable intelligent scaling at reduced cost without forklift upgrades.  

  • Cisco participates in over 75+ standards bodies
  • Cisco has been issued several thousand patents in networking hardware and software innovations over the last 25 years
  • Cisco invests significant R&D effort in innovations, drives innovations into standards and invests in post-standards activity based on customer requirements 

FCoE Standards are here – you don’t have to wait

FCoE standards (called FC-BB-5) were ratified in 2009 and published in May of 2010.  

You don’t have to wait for a different standard for multi-hop FCoE — FC-BB-5 also sets the standard for multi-hop FCoE.  

While the standards bodies are always working on enhancements, it doesn’t mean you have to wait for FCoE technology-based products.  FCoE standards simply mean in the future, you will continue to have new features and capabilities that are standards-based.

Why did some vendors not participate in crucial FCoE/8G FC Interop testing?

 Two main reasons which come to mind are: 

1)      They don’t use standards-based approach

2)      They don’t have the product ready for prime time, multi-vendor testing

 For a more thorough analysis on vendors and FCoE standards  see J Metz’s blog.  

 If you are planning a “data center convergence project”, check with your vendors to see 1) they support standards-based implementations and 2) their protocol convergence roadmap supports more than just FCoE.   Remember, FCoE is not just about FCoE, it’s about how to seamlessly scale your multi-protocol environments (FC, FCoE, and iSCSI).

 For more info how to bring scale and intelligence into your converged networks, take a look at Cisco Unified Fabric

Tony Antony
Sr Marketing Manager
Data Center/ Storage Solutions

Leave a comment

We'd love to hear from you! To earn points and badges for participating in the conversation, join Cisco Social Rewards. Your comment(s) will appear instantly on the live site. Spam, promotional and derogatory comments will be removed.

In an effort to keep conversations fresh, Cisco Blogs closes comments after 60 days. Please visit the Cisco Blogs hub page for the latest content.


  1. Really? I have yet to find a single company that is planning to manufacture non-standards based FCoE. While the plugfests can be useful, it's not the litmus test for product readiness. Cisco takes plenty of attacks on standards/proprietary, so I'm disappointed to see that just because some vendors don't make one of these plugfests that you'd suggest that they aren't just as committed to standards or working in multi-vendor solutions.