Cloud Security, commentary on a GigaOm article…
Alistair over at GigaOm penned an interesting piece on the role of security in the cloud. Alistair raises some interesting points- that since there are less humans involved in cloud architectures, that processes are more stringent, and that it is not your employees these architectures can be trusted more implicitly. I would say ‘I agree IF…’ (big IF)...
- What are the security policies, processes, guidelines, within the cloud?
- Who will have access to my data, is it encrypted at rest and on the fly?
- Who owns the encryption key for the PKI infrastructure that better be there to encrypt/decrypt my data?
- Who can see the logs of where accesses are coming from into my ‘infrastructure’? Can I?
- What mechanisms of segmentation are used between tenants in any location where multi-tenancy exists?
- How far ‘down’ are these tenants shielded from each other? Data plane separation at the data link layer- VLANs? Or something more elegant at L2, L3, and on the Control Planes of the devices?
- Is the security policy protecting my workloads auditable?
- Is the policy protecting my workload consistent with my IT departments requirements, or tuned for the application?
Couple all of this with the want, need, desire for portable workloads across autonomous systems and you have a set of questions that, if answered well, will increase the value of the cloud to potential customers, but if not addressed and visibly addressed will continue to be an inhibitor of cloud services to the more cautious customer sets.
dg
-
Posted by Douglas Gourlay at 01:31PM PST


Rodos Dec 12, 2008
Douglas, do you think providers should public audits of security reviews that cover these items? What can providers do to give the confidence required?