<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Analyst Relations Insights</title>
    <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/</link>
     <description>Thoughts and Opinions on Industry Trends and Issues</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>jefreund@cisco.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-11-18T16:38:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Gartner Blade Server MQ and Associated Thoughts</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/gartner_blade_server_mq_and_associated_thoughts/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/gartner_blade_server_mq_and_associated_thoughts/#When:15:38:50Z</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>So we recently purchased redistribution rights to the <a href="http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/cisco/170419.html">Gartner Blade Server Magic Quadrant</a>.&nbsp; Here&rsquo;s what Gartner permits me to say about that:</p>
<table style="width: 100%; text-align: left;" border="0" cellspacing="8" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="vertical-align: top;"><a href="http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/cisco/170419.html"><img style="border: 0px solid ;" src="http://na2.imagesrv.gartner.com/media-products/reprints/images/common/gartnerlogo.gif;pvb53b8361652f91d5" alt="Gartner" /></a></td>
<td><em>In the Magic Quadrant for Blade Servers, Gartner states that &#8220;blades represent an important stage in the evolution of servers as separate, discrete platforms give way to modular designs and the boundaries between servers, storage and networking become increasingly porous&#8221;.&nbsp; In the report, Cisco is placed in the Visionary Quadrant, which defines &#8220;large vendors with a plan to drive market success through technology innovation.&#8221;</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I relish a good working relationship with Gartner, so I won&#8217;t dwell on the report (you can parse it for yourself)&#8212;except to mention in passing that I find Cisco&#8217;s placement (and the accompanying kind words) the most interesting thread in the report.&nbsp; Of course, I&#8217;m biased.<br /><br /> Instead of discussing that in context of the report, I&#8217;ll simply share some associated thoughts about how the analysts (as well as partners and customers, of course) have begun to realize how dead serious Cisco is about the server market.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t really find that very surprising, but, then again, I spend all day long talking to &#8220;server guys.&#8221;&nbsp; Heck, I&#8217;m a server guy.&nbsp; Well, actually, I&#8217;m a software guy who spent long enough working for Sun to be able to fake a little feeds and speeds.&nbsp; But I digress.&nbsp; The point is: the server competency at Cisco is not to be underestimated.&nbsp; <br /><br /> It might be hard to believe the server focus behind <a href="http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/data_center/unifiedcomputing_promo.html">Unified Computing</a> for those that hold their Cisco preconceptions dear, but constituencies across the datacenter are really paying attention&mdash;and, in any case, it&rsquo;s the convergence of compute and network that makes the promise of <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/ps6418/ps6423/ps6429/prod_white_paper0900aecd80337bb8.html">Unified Fabric</a> possible.&nbsp; HP certainly gets this&mdash;at least if you are willing to see its purchase of 3Com in part as a defensive measure.&nbsp; But just as I don&#8217;t want to challenge Gartner&#8217;s usage policy, I&#8217;ll leave my comments about our large, fine corporate partner on the brief side.<br /><br /> One final note: I know it&#8217;s somewhat controversial to blog about a particular piece of research from a given firm&mdash;for which I&#8217;ve drawn fire in the past.&nbsp; The reasoning behind this is that I&#8217;m not supposed to be perceived as favoring the research or opinions of a particular firm&mdash;no matter what their market size or influence&#8212;when dealing with a wide group of opinionated analysts.&nbsp; While I understand that POV, I also tend to give my audience a bit of credit.&nbsp; Plus, I&#8217;ve always been of the opinion that we buy distribution rights in order to share these opinions and spark debate.&nbsp; And so I am.</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-11-18T15:38:50+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Gartner Blade Server MQ and Associated Thoughts</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/gartner_blade_server_mq_and_associated_thoughts1/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/gartner_blade_server_mq_and_associated_thoughts1/#When:15:38:15Z</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>So we recently purchased redistribution rights to the <a href="http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/cisco/170419.html">Gartner Blade Server Magic Quadrant</a>.&nbsp; Here&rsquo;s what Gartner permits me to say about that:</p>
<table style="width: 100%; text-align: left;" border="0" cellspacing="8" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="vertical-align: top;"><a href="http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/cisco/170419.html"><img style="border: 0px solid ;" src="http://na2.imagesrv.gartner.com/media-products/reprints/images/common/gartnerlogo.gif;pvb53b8361652f91d5" alt="Gartner" /></a></td>
<td><em>In the Magic Quadrant for Blade Servers, Gartner states that &#8220;blades represent an important stage in the evolution of servers as separate, discrete platforms give way to modular designs and the boundaries between servers, storage and networking become increasingly porous&#8221;.&nbsp; In the report, Cisco is placed in the Visionary Quadrant, which defines &#8220;large vendors with a plan to drive market success through technology innovation.&#8221;</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I relish a good working relationship with Gartner, so I won&#8217;t dwell on the report (you can parse it for yourself)&#8212;except to mention in passing that I find Cisco&#8217;s placement (and the accompanying kind words) the most interesting thread in the report.&nbsp; Of course, I&#8217;m biased.<br /><br /> Instead of discussing that in context of the report, I&#8217;ll simply share some associated thoughts about how the analysts (as well as partners and customers, of course) have begun to realize how dead serious Cisco is about the server market.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t really find that very surprising, but, then again, I spend all day long talking to &#8220;server guys.&#8221;&nbsp; Heck, I&#8217;m a server guy.&nbsp; Well, actually, I&#8217;m a software guy who spent long enough working for Sun to be able to fake a little feeds and speeds.&nbsp; But I digress.&nbsp; The point is: the server competency at Cisco is not to be underestimated.&nbsp; <br /><br /> It might be hard to believe the server focus behind <a href="http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/data_center/unifiedcomputing_promo.html">Unified Computing</a> for those that hold their Cisco preconceptions dear, but constituencies across the datacenter are really paying attention&mdash;and, in any case, it&rsquo;s the convergence of compute and network that makes the promise of <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/ps6418/ps6423/ps6429/prod_white_paper0900aecd80337bb8.html">Unified Fabric</a> possible.&nbsp; HP certainly gets this&mdash;at least if you are willing to see its purchase of 3Com in part as a defensive measure.&nbsp; But just as I don&#8217;t want to challenge Gartner&#8217;s usage policy, I&#8217;ll leave my comments about our large, fine corporate partner on the brief side.<br /><br /> One final note: I know it&#8217;s somewhat controversial to blog about a particular piece of research from a given firm&mdash;for which I&#8217;ve drawn fire in the past.&nbsp; The reasoning behind this is that I&#8217;m not supposed to be perceived as favoring the research or opinions of a particular firm&mdash;no matter what their market size or influence&#8212;when dealing with a wide group of opinionated analysts.&nbsp; While I understand that POV, I also tend to give my audience a bit of credit.&nbsp; Plus, I&#8217;ve always been of the opinion that we buy distribution rights in order to share these opinions and spark debate.&nbsp; And so I am.</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-11-18T15:38:15+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Cisco extends its collaboration portfolio and drives business value</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/cisco_extends_its_collaboration_portfolio_and_drives_business_value/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/cisco_extends_its_collaboration_portfolio_and_drives_business_value/#When:19:30:22Z</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Significant product introductions across all categories of Cisco&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns1007/index.html">collaboration</a> portfolio<strong></strong></li>
<li>Inter-company collaboration through rich video, voice, and presence </li>
<li>New enterprise social software solutions </li>
<li>Cisco&#8217;s hosted email offering, based on the Postpath acquisition</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2009/prod_110809.html">Learn More</a></p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-11-12T19:30:22+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Cisco&#8217;s Collaboration Announcement</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/recent_positive_industry_sentiment_on_ciscos_collaboration_annoucement/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/recent_positive_industry_sentiment_on_ciscos_collaboration_annoucement/#When:17:46:49Z</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/information_management/2009/11/ciscos-collaboration-strategy-coming-through-the-network-door.html"></a></p><p>
<a href="/collaboration/comments/the_new_collaboration_experience/">http://blogs.cisco.com/collaboration/comments/the_new_collaboration_experience/</a>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-11-12T17:46:49+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Cisco WebEx Mail has arrived!</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/cisco_webex_mail_has_arrived/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/cisco_webex_mail_has_arrived/#When:17:46:13Z</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">Yes folks, it&#8217;s here.&nbsp; This week Cisco introduced the next evolution of corporate-grade email, Cisco WebEx Mail.&nbsp; It is a hosted email solution (using technology from the acquisition of PostPath in 2008)&nbsp;which features native Microsoft Outlook interoperability, optimized mobile device support, and browser-independent AJAX web 2.0 access. </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">Hear details on Cisco WebEx Mail from Duncan Greatwood, Senior Director of Cisco WebEx Mail and former CEO of PostPath: <a href="http://www.cisco.com/go/arpodcasts">www.cisco.com/go/arpodcasts</a></span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: 'Verdana','sans-serif'">READERS:&nbsp; What are your thoughts on the Cisco WebEx Mail news?&nbsp; Do you think enterprise customers are ready to move to hosted email?</span></p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-11-12T17:46:13+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Live from the Cisco Collaboration Summit</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/live_from_the_cisco_collaboration_summit/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/live_from_the_cisco_collaboration_summit/#When:20:57:36Z</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>Live from Cisco&#8217;s 2009 Collaboration Summit.&nbsp; Excitement is in the air and there is much buzz about the Cisco Collaboration announcements.</p>
<p><a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/index.html">http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/index.html</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-11-10T20:57:36+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Gartner Symposium, Fall 2009</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/gartner_symposium_fall_2009_trust/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/gartner_symposium_fall_2009_trust/#When:19:27:31Z</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I narrowly escaped the inevitable, yet all too early New England snowstorms for a welcome respite in sunny Orlando.&nbsp; Instead of being blanketed with large white flakes of snow, I was ensconced by valuable dialogue and engaged with intriguing presentations by leading industry analysts at the Gartner Symposium</p>
<p>The presentations given by the Gartner analysts reflected some of their recently published research reports. &nbsp;Throughout the conference Gartner advised that IT organizations focus on Pattern-Based Strategy, Context Aware Computing, and Operational Technologies to maintain system integrity:</p>
<p><strong>1)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Pattern Based Strategy:</strong> understanding &#8220;how activities, events, objects, and information may form new patterns that represent an opportunity for innovation or a threat of disruption to business operations or strategy.&nbsp; <em><a href="http://my.gartner.com/portal/server.pt?open=512&amp;objID=260&amp;mode=2&amp;PageID=3460702&amp;resId=1189913&amp;ref=QuickSearch&amp;sthkw=context+aware+computing">Introducing Pattern-Based Strategy</a>, <a href="http://my.gartner.com/portal/server.pt?open=512&amp;objID=260&amp;mode=2&amp;PageID=3460706&amp;authorId=15631">Yvonne Genovese</a> et al, 7 August 2009</em></p>
<p><strong>2)</strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong>Context Aware Computing:&nbsp; </strong><em><a href="http://my.gartner.com/portal/server.pt?open=512&amp;objID=260&amp;mode=2&amp;PageID=3460702&amp;resId=1189913&amp;ref=QuickSearch&amp;sthkw=context+aware+computing">Context-Aware Computing: Context Drives Next-Generation User Interfaces</a>, <a href="http://my.gartner.com/portal/server.pt?open=512&amp;objID=260&amp;mode=2&amp;PageID=3460706&amp;authorId=6543">Jackie Fenn </a>et al, 25 September 2009</em></p>
<p><strong>3)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Operational Technologies: </strong>Gartner defines operational technologies as &#8220;devices, sensors, and software used to control or monitor physical assets and processes in real time to maintain system integrity.&#8221; &nbsp;<em><a href="http://my.gartner.com/portal/server.pt?open=512&amp;objID=260&amp;mode=2&amp;PageID=3460702&amp;resId=1189913&amp;ref=QuickSearch&amp;sthkw=context+aware+computing">Findings: Operational Technologies Increasingly Need to Be Integrated With IT</a>, <a href="http://my.gartner.com/portal/server.pt?open=512&amp;objID=260&amp;mode=2&amp;PageID=3460706&amp;authorId=8489">John P. Roberts </a>et al, 20 October 2009</em></p>
<p>Did you attend Symposium?&nbsp; How are you using these concepts to build trust in your organization?</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-10-27T19:27:31+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>IBM Begins Hawking the Cisco Nexus 4000 Blade Switch</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/ibm_begins_hawking_the_cisco_nexus_4000_blade_switch/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/ibm_begins_hawking_the_cisco_nexus_4000_blade_switch/#When:16:49:21Z</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>A week or so back, Cisco announced the availability of the Nexus 4000&#8212;an FCoE switchdesigned to fit in other vendor racks.&nbsp; The Nexus 4000 heralded great benefits, not the least of which included the promise of extending the unified fabric to a host of new platforms.&nbsp; There was only one problem with the otherwise stellar announcement: We neglected to tell you who would be selling the product.</p>
<p>Well, as reported in <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/23/ibm_bladecenter_networking/">El Reg</a> today, the first of those partners, IBM, has begun selling the Nexus 4000 (expect more vendors to follow suit).&nbsp; And, as <a href="/datacenter/comments/cisco_nexus_4001i_switch_module_for_ibm_bladecenter/">Kash</a> points out on his excellent blog you can find the Nexus 4000 blade switch IBM description at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0754.html">http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0754.html</a></p>
<p>and included in the IBM websites below:</p>
<p><a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/bladecenter/hardware/openfabric/fcoe.html">http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/bladecenter/hardware/openfabric/fcoe.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/bladecenter/hardware/openfabric/ethernet.html">http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/bladecenter/hardware/openfabric/ethernet.html</a></p>
<p>and on the Cisco website:&nbsp; <a href="http://www.cisco.com/go/nexus4000">http://www.cisco.com/go/nexus4000</a></p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-10-23T16:49:21+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Collaboration and Enterprise 2.0</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/collaboration_and_enterprise_2.0/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/collaboration_and_enterprise_2.0/#When:04:09:49Z</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<div dir="ltr"><p><span style="font-family: Calibri;">
</p><p>My colleague Jackie Roy summarized the recent Irwin Lazar, analyst&nbsp;at&nbsp;Nemertes, blog post correctly with:</p>
<p>&#8221;...growing reality that a complete <strong>collaboration strategy</strong> must integrate all potential ways that individuals and groups work together&#8221;</p>
<p>It is particularly interesting to see that Enterprises are looking to bring these disparate teams together but must looking at security<strong>, compliance and governance issues, and they are&nbsp;orchestrating a strategy that merges the old way of communicating with new tools such as microblogging and facebook-style applications for the enterprise. </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.analystprofiles.com/public/irwinlazar">http://www.analystprofiles.com/public/irwinlazar</a></p><p>
</span></p></div>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-10-23T04:09:49+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>News Flash: Video Traffic is On the Rise  ;&#45;)</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/news_flash_video_traffic_is_on_the_rise/</link>
      <guid>http://blogs.cisco.com/ciscotalk/ar/comments/news_flash_video_traffic_is_on_the_rise/#When:16:20:34Z</guid>
       <description><![CDATA[<p>This just in&hellip;.Video Traffic is growing&hellip;I know, I know, &nbsp;it&rsquo;s hardly ground-breaking news, but when you look at some of the data released as part of our ongoing Visual Networking Index (VNI) Forecast program released today, some of the facts are pretty eye-opening.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What made this installment of the VNI all the more impactful is that a majority of the data was the result of a cooperative program between Cisco and a group of more than 20 service providers worldwide who share their anonymous, aggregated network usage to identify trends, etc.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Consider, the following:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>About 10% of the world&rsquo;s broadband subscribers generate more than 60% of all Internet traffic &ndash; <em>ok, I&rsquo;ll take some of the credit for this&hellip;have I shared with you the videos of my kids playing hockey&hellip;? <img title="Wink" src="/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-wink.gif" border="0" alt="Wink" /></em></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>Globally, the average broadband connection consumes about 4.3 gigabytes visual networking applications (advanced services such as video, social networking and collaboration) traffic per month.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>  <ul>
<li>&nbsp;This amount is roughly the equivalent of approximately 20.5 short- form Internet videos or approximately 1.1 hours of Internet video, whether streamed on its own, embedded in a Web page, or viewed as part of video communications.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s a lot more good data in the study, for more information, there are some additional links below.&nbsp; Enjoy</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/Cisco_VNI_Usage_QA.htm">Cisco Visual Networking Index Usage FAQ</a></li>
<li>Cisco VNI Usage Site: <a href="http://www.ciscovni.com/" target="_blank">http://www.ciscovni.com/</a> </li>
<li>Cisco VNI site: <a href="http://www.cisco.com/go/vni">http://www.cisco.com/go/vni</a></li>
<li><a href="/sp/comments/cisco_announces_the_visual_networking_index_usage_study">Cisco SP 360 Video Blog</a> </li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-10-21T16:20:34+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>