<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cisco Blog &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cisco.com/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cisco.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Hey, it was a joke.  No need for handcuffs.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/hey-it-was-a-joke-no-need-for-handcuffs/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hey-it-was-a-joke-no-need-for-handcuffs</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/hey-it-was-a-joke-no-need-for-handcuffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Aceves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=60434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post discusses the recent detainment of two young British tourists in Los Angeles, California who were suspected of planning terroristic and other criminal activities due to the a misunderstanding of their Twitter messages (aka tweets).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/hey-it-was-a-joke-no-need-for-handcuffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco IPS Signature Retirement and the Default Configuration</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-ips-signature-retirement-and-the-default-configuration/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cisco-ips-signature-retirement-and-the-default-configuration</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-ips-signature-retirement-and-the-default-configuration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Sulym</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=59831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walter Sulym from the Cisco IPS team explains the signature retirement process and how the default configuration is determined.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-ips-signature-retirement-and-the-default-configuration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCADA Syndrome and Lifelong Education</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/scada-syndrome-and-lifelong-education/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=scada-syndrome-and-lifelong-education</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/scada-syndrome-and-lifelong-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damir Rajnovic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=59486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many times have we encountered a situation where some part of the software industry starts small, in a closed environment, then grows and attracts a lot of attention before realising that things were not designed properly for this changed environment? On a large scale, I would say three times. It happened with the Internet, operating systems, and system and industrial control systems (also referred to as SCADA). This transition from a closed environment to an open environment inevitably exposes aspects that were overlooked during the development phase. The speed of this transition will only exacerbate the situation.  Because SCADA systems are currently going through this transition I will call this a "SCADA Syndrome."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/scada-syndrome-and-lifelong-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco 4Q11 Global Threat Report</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-4q11-global-threat-report/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cisco-4q11-global-threat-report</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-4q11-global-threat-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Landesman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarterly threat report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=58096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cisco 4Q11 Global Threat Report has been released. The report covers the period from 1 October 2011 through 31 December 2011 and features data from across Cisco Security Intelligence Operations. This quarter’s contributors were Cisco Intrusion Prevention System (IPS), Cisco IronPort, Cisco Security Research and Operations (SR&#38;O), and Cisco ScanSafe.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-4q11-global-threat-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Correlating NetFlow Data for Proactive Security: Network Notoriety</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/correlating-netflow-data-for-proactive-security-network-notoriety/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=correlating-netflow-data-for-proactive-security-network-notoriety</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/correlating-netflow-data-for-proactive-security-network-notoriety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Schiffman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=57763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prelude In this short article the reader will first learn what NetFlow is and how it works. Next the reader [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/correlating-netflow-data-for-proactive-security-network-notoriety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco IPS Sensor Default Signature Configuration Modifications</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-ips-sensor-default-signature-configuration-modifications/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cisco-ips-sensor-default-signature-configuration-modifications</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-ips-sensor-default-signature-configuration-modifications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Sulym</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intrusion prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=57380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The threat landscape is an ever evolving environment that must be addressed with constant iteration. Since the Cisco Intrusion Prevention System signature configuration has grown over the past few years, the Cisco Security Research and Operations IPS Signature Development Team performed an exhaustive review of the default IPS signature settings currently shipping. As a result of that analysis, the team will be releasing changes to the default signature set via signature updates in a two-phase process over the course of several months.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-ips-sensor-default-signature-configuration-modifications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New User Interfaces in Cars &#8211; flashy but are they safe?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/new-user-interfaces-in-cars-flashy-but-are-they-safe/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-user-interfaces-in-cars-flashy-but-are-they-safe</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/new-user-interfaces-in-cars-flashy-but-are-they-safe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Damir Rajnovic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety and security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=56301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post discusses the potential safety issues surrounding some of the new user interfaces, e.g. touch screens, found in automobiles today.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/new-user-interfaces-in-cars-flashy-but-are-they-safe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Shopping: A Classic Case of Convenience vs Security</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/online-shopping-a-classic-case-of-convenience-vs-security/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=online-shopping-a-classic-case-of-convenience-vs-security</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/online-shopping-a-classic-case-of-convenience-vs-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrae Middleton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=55517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is certainly a new day and age for many aspects of today’s society. One prominent sector that continues to lead by example in this area is the Internet, more specifically the online shopping environment. Note that online shopping is not a simple matter of go to a website, click “buy,” and checkout. That would be too simple. Ironically the purchase aspect itself tends to be the simplest matter here. The crux of the experience begins with the search and research phase. What exactly does one need/want? Is there a particular brand in mind? Is there a popular alternative? The convenience of asking and gathering answers to these questions and many more begin the journey, and thanks to the power and slew of resources the Internet provides, shoppers are able to search common products, brands, uses, verify details such as durability, ease of use and more based on the numerous rating systems, applications, web 2.0 solutions, social networking, and the ongoing phenomena that continue to evolve. So what does this mean? What does this have to do with security?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/online-shopping-a-classic-case-of-convenience-vs-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Releases the 2011 Annual Security Report</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-releases-the-2011-annual-security-report/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cisco-releases-the-2011-annual-security-report</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-releases-the-2011-annual-security-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Shipley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud_computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=54704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post focuses on the recent simultaneous publication of the Cisco 2011 Annual Security Report and the Cisco Connected World Technology Report Chapter 3.  Several highlights from the reports focus on the shifting technologies, expectations, and employee behaviors already impacting many work environments and that are expected to further shift the work dynamics in the future.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/cisco-releases-the-2011-annual-security-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The .KID Top Level Domain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/the-kid-top-level-domain/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-kid-top-level-domain</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/the-kid-top-level-domain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Archibald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top level domain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=54330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to the recent push to move websites that contain adult content into the .xxx sponsored top level domain (sTLD) in order to easily classify them this post discusses the merits of creating a ".kid" sTLD that will be reserved for websites that host content that is considered and approved to be "safe" for children surfing the Internet.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/security/the-kid-top-level-domain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

