Comments on: IPv6 Peering, Part 1: Questions For Your Service Provider http://blogs.cisco.com/borderless/ipv6-peering-part-1-questions-for-your-service-provider/ Sun, 26 May 2013 02:27:30 +0000 hourly 1 By: TechieLog http://blogs.cisco.com/borderless/ipv6-peering-part-1-questions-for-your-service-provider/#comment-613457 TechieLog Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:49:44 +0000 http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=76508#comment-613457 What To Ask From Your Service Provider About IPv6 is really useful for me.

   0 likes

]]> By: ISP Company http://blogs.cisco.com/borderless/ipv6-peering-part-1-questions-for-your-service-provider/#comment-612033 ISP Company Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:07:31 +0000 http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=76508#comment-612033 ite very interesting one, thanks for your post

   0 likes

]]> By: Jim Bailey http://blogs.cisco.com/borderless/ipv6-peering-part-1-questions-for-your-service-provider/#comment-611801 Jim Bailey Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:24:05 +0000 http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=76508#comment-611801 Mohammed,

Integration of IPv6 into a network is certainly a large project to undertake. It involves dealing with the network infrastructure, the host/server infrastructure, the applications, etc. I’ve been trying to show that by breaking the project into multiple pieces that it can be done. I will not say “easily done” because there are still lots of pieces and parts to deal with even if the project is broken down into component projects. However, by breaking the project into smaller projects, you do get problems that are easier to manage and implement. In the interest of narrowing down the scope of your comment, is there a certain aspect of IPv6 integration that concerns you?

regards,

-jim

   0 likes

]]> By: mohammed http://blogs.cisco.com/borderless/ipv6-peering-part-1-questions-for-your-service-provider/#comment-611777 mohammed Mon, 16 Jul 2012 21:11:35 +0000 http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=76508#comment-611777 IPv6 not fine , because its large

   0 likes

]]>