<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cisco Blog &#187; Mike Capuano</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cisco.com/author/MikeCapuano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cisco.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Multi-vendor MPLS-TP Interoperability Demonstrated for Packet Transport Networks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/multi-vendor-mpls-tp-interoperability-demonstrated-for-packet-transport-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/multi-vendor-mpls-tp-interoperability-demonstrated-for-packet-transport-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Capuano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SP360: Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asr 9000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier packet transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EANTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ietf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP/MPLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isocore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itu-t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS OAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS-TP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p-ots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Y.1731]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=26272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Widely deployed from the core to the edge, IP/MPLS has achieved huge success as a mature, standards-based technology now deployed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/multi-vendor-mpls-tp-interoperability-demonstrated-for-packet-transport-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real (Networking) Stars of Los Angeles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/the-real-networking-stars-of-los-angeles/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/the-real-networking-stars-of-los-angeles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Capuano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SP360: Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier packet transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoreOptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRS-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS-TP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OFC/NFOEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Provider]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=24514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early this month the stars in Los Angeles weren’t walking the Red Carpet, nor Tweeting about #winning, nor trashing their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/the-real-networking-stars-of-los-angeles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is No Split Standard in MPLS OAM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/there-is-no-split-standard-in-mpls-oam/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/there-is-no-split-standard-in-mpls-oam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 20:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Capuano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SP360: Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EANTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ietf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isocore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itu-t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS OAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS-TP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study Group 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Y.1731]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Y1731]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=21957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of buzz recently about a second OAM (Operations, Administration, and Maintenance) solution for MPLS-TP that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/there-is-no-split-standard-in-mpls-oam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPv6: The Time Has Come</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/ipv6-the-time-has-come/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/ipv6-the-time-has-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Capuano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SP360: Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier grade ipv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cgv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipv4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v6 world congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World IPv6 Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=20906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.upperside.fr/v6world2011/v6world2011intro.htm"></a> “IPv6’s time has come. For a long time considered a satisfactory but too costly technical solution to implement, IPv6 is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/ipv6-the-time-has-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For IPv4 the Sunset Begins. For IPv6 the Day Is Just Getting Started</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/for-ipv4-the-sunset-begins-for-ipv6-the-day-is-just-getting-started/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/for-ipv4-the-sunset-begins-for-ipv6-the-day-is-just-getting-started/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Capuano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SP360: Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier grade ipv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cgv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipv4 address exhaustion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Provider]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=19377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was quick! I mentioned <a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/iana-ipv4-address-depletion-change-is-the-only-constant/" target="_blank">earlier in the week</a> that, in any day, the IANA would hand out the last IPv4 address. <a href="http://www.icann.org/en/news/releases/release-03feb11-en.pdf" target="_blank">Today it happened</a> . And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/for-ipv4-the-sunset-begins-for-ipv6-the-day-is-just-getting-started/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IANA IPv4 Address Depletion: Change is the Only Constant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/iana-ipv4-address-depletion-change-is-the-only-constant/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/iana-ipv4-address-depletion-change-is-the-only-constant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Capuano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SP360: Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier grade ipv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cgv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet assigned numbers authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipv4 address exhaustion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v6 world congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World IPv6 Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=19076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought my children would never fully understand what a life changing experience the Internet has had on our society. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/iana-ipv4-address-depletion-change-is-the-only-constant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When that Video Absolutely, Positively Has to Get Through</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/when-that-video-absolutely-positively-has-to-get-through/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/when-that-video-absolutely-positively-has-to-get-through/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Capuano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SP360: Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asr 9000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRS-3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated video monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lossless video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video optimized transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vidmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero loss transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero loss video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=15314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let’s face it - <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6H6CcGiuFo" target="_blank">dancing cats</a> are cute and apocalyptic <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYffYT2y-Iw" target="_blank">visions of the future without IPv6</a> can be entertaining, but a glitch or two&#8230;or a “video not available” won’t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/when-that-video-absolutely-positively-has-to-get-through/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foundation for Next-Generation Transport: The Cisco Carrier Packet Transport System</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/foundation-for-next-generation-transport-the-cisco-carrier-packet-transport-system/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/foundation-for-next-generation-transport-the-cisco-carrier-packet-transport-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Capuano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SP360: Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier packet transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisco prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPT 200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPT 50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPT 600]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP NGN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS-TP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p-ots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packet-optical transport system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=13339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SONET and SDH, while well established and highly reliable technologies, were optimized for an era of TDM voice communications - before [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/foundation-for-next-generation-transport-the-cisco-carrier-packet-transport-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Working Together to Attain MPLS-TP Interoperability</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/working-together-to-attain-mpls-tp-interoperability/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/working-together-to-attain-mpls-tp-interoperability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Capuano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SP360: Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ietf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ietf working group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isocore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itu-t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS-TP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packet transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rfc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/?p=11536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IP services are dominating overall network traffic growth and service providers are now truly architecting a transition from legacy Time [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/working-together-to-attain-mpls-tp-interoperability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Packet or Transport? Get Your Questions Ready for October 5th</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/packet_or_transport_get_your_questions_ready_for_october_5th/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/packet_or_transport_get_your_questions_ready_for_october_5th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Capuano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SP360: Service Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Plane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G.709]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP NGN Virtual Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP/MPLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPoDWDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPLS-TP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panel discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport Technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cisco.com/a_new_twist_on_denial_of_service_ddos_as_a_service</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The OSI stack has long served the telecom industry as a model for engineering since the early 80&#8242;s (which IMHO [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/packet_or_transport_get_your_questions_ready_for_october_5th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
