Cisco Analyst Relations Blog

« Welcome | Main | Collaboration: The Next Frontier »

August 15, 2007

Why C-Scape?

Last year was the debut of our C-Scape Global Forum. Many of you will fondly (I hope!) remember the previous iteration of that event, the Worldwide Analyst Conference, or as it was known internally – WWAC. So, why did we ‘whack’ WWAC? (you’ll now have that nursery rhyme “This Old Man” playing in your head for the rest of the day. Sorry...)

We made the change because we believed WWAC wasn’t providing either of us with the best value possible. Essentially, WWAC had turned into a reporting vehicle. We had the parade of senior executives from the various business units and product areas with their 40-slide updates, and we ended up pitching at you instead of engaging you.

Hence, C-Scape. We realized we weren’t culling the best strategic value from our relationships with the industry influencers, so we redesigned our event to focus on discussion, debate and dialogue. We wanted to bring the prevailing issues of the day to this forum and engage you in two-way conversations. We wanted to create an environment where there was more networking time; more opportunities for one-on-one meetings; and more meaningful discussions.

Our philosophy around how we engage and interact with the industry analysts and other influencers has undergone a transformation over the last couple of years, and there is no one better than our chairman and CEO, John Chambers, to explain why that change has happened. This clip was taken from a recent internal meeting with employees, where John answered the question on how his views on the use of industry analysts has changed over time.


              Duration: 1 min. 40 sec.

Have we been successful in that? You’ll be the ultimate judge obviously. We believe we took some positive steps with last year’s event, but we want to ensure we make any needed changes as we go into this year’s forum. If you have any ideas, suggestions or comments, please let me know. I’d love to hear from you.

Posted by Skip MacAskill on August 15, 2007 10:49 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.cisco.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/1052

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why C-Scape?:

» Cisco Analyst Relations blog from ARcade
It's been (another) busy week and I am a bit late on picking up that Cisco has launched an Analyst Relations [Read More]

Tracked on August 18, 2007 08:52 AM

Comments

Skip, we face the same issues for our big analyst event. You can contact me to hear what we face and how we get things done..

Posted by john simonds on August 15, 2007 06:15 PM

Skip, from an old Gartner colleague...good to hear John's views...sound like he realizes the influence game has changed in the last few years. As a fellow blogger clearly I believe blogs have some influence now. But CIOs are relying more and more on each other (I run a firm which works with CIOs)...somebody sent me this quote a few months ago

"In the 1970's when CIO's wanted to know what to buy, they asked IBM.

In the 1980's when CIO's wanted to know what to buy, they asked Andersen Consulting.

In the 1990's when CIO's wanted to know what to buy, they asked Gartner.

In the 2000's when CIO's want to know what to buy, they ask each other."

Good luck with your blog...

Posted by vinnie mirchandani on August 18, 2007 01:32 PM

Compare to all of the other CEO's of companies in this space---John has made himself available to the Analyst community, and is not afraid to take on the tough questions and challenges us on his view. I wish other companies were as consistence with this. It's very valuable in understanding the top line strategy. Keep it up.

Posted by Ray Mota on August 23, 2007 01:43 PM


Post a Comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

 

Legal Disclaimer

Some of the individuals posting to this site, including the moderators, work for Cisco Systems. Opinions expressed here and in any corresponding comments are the personal opinions of the original authors, not of Cisco. The content is provided for informational purposes only and is not meant to be an endorsement or representation by Cisco or any other party. This site is available to the public. No information you consider confidential should be posted to this site. By posting you agree to be solely responsible for the content of all information you contribute, link to, or otherwise upload to the Website and release Cisco from any liability related to your use of the Website. You also grant to Cisco a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free and fully-paid, transferable (including rights to sublicense) right to exercise all copyright, publicity, and moral rights with respect to any original content you provide. The comments are moderated. Comments will appear as soon as they are approved by the moderator.

© 1992-2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.